On Friday 30 July 2010 08:33:38 Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
If you don't read that in the proposal, we should adapt the text to make it clear, that the openSUSE distribution is a primary focus, not an after- thought.
Hi Cornelius, Can someone with experience take time and depict that with a flow diagram ? Why I'm asking this? They tend to lower or remove language comprehension barrier from equation. They describe relations between elements in very concise form, that otherwise require a lot of text. Why I'm not doing this? I have no distribution creation experience. The best I can provide is some kind of rough sketch that everybody already knows, but even that I can't provide in a better form then some odp file that can be stored on the wiki. Why is this important? We need strong consent on what to do, and we will have no or weak consent if many of us have some reservations, ie. "I support idea, but not this part." Sum of all reservations can be small, but they create dissatisfaction and get disproportionally more attention in our minds then points that we agree with. Conversely it takes a lot more energy to handle relatively small amount of disagreements at every step of planing. I believe that diagram can help to understand current situation and reasons for proposals to everybody that doesn't live everyday 8 hours inside the distribution vendor. Sincerely, it may help even you guys to get better overview where we are then pure texts. I don't believe that text of reasonable size can provide amount of information in one flow diagram. -- Regards, Rajko -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org