One reason I rarely post to these lists is because it is so painful. If you disagree or even try and put the other side, you are immediately flamed.
Actually these SuSE lists are amongst the friendliest on the 'net. Perhaps you can't tell the difference between people who disagree with you and want to debate the issue, and a flame?
I find it very difficult when people say I'm right and you are wrong when all of it is subjective - this is called bigotry.
No it's not, it's called disagreement. The world isn't out to get you, you know.
Derek Fountain wrote:
" > This is my last comment on this subject.
Then I won't bother reading or answering."
I did indeed.
I find this very typical at the moment and the reason why companies such as SCO are having a field day (whether or not they lose their case).
I'm flattered that you consider that my opinions carry so much weight, and amount to the reason why SCO sued IBM, but I don't think you're right.
They just see arrogance, which is a shame because the majority of us are not.
Let me get this right. You sent me a private email, the first sentence of which stated (incorrectly) that you are ending the debate with it. And I'm the arrogant one? What exactly did you expect me to do?
You can comment about QT as much as you like, what I was saying was that I wasn't going to be drawn into a fruitless argument.
Got that wrong then, didn't you?
I did not at any time say QT was bad - I expressed a preference, I use both and neither are bad. Accept the fact that people are going to differ from what you say.
I accept that. Never doubted it for a moment. What I'm not sure about is why you've taken people disagreeing with *you* so personally. Perhaps you should, er, just accept the fact that people are going to differ from what you say.