On 21.8.2017 16:41, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 08/21/2017 03:46 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
(you might get interesting results with the commented out %files section as well)
hope this helps
Definitely. Thanks a lot for the quick help!
Hmm. So, I have followed your advice and properly commented out %python_build and so on. While it now builds fine, it actually just generates the source RPM.
I thoroughly checked whether I missed something obvious but I couldn't find anything. With the changes in the diff, I just get the source RPM.
You don't have any %files sections. If you want a package, you need the appropriate %files section, even if they are empty. Otherwise the package is not generated. In this case, simply uncomment the "%files %{python_files}" line. (RPM only generates packages that have appropriate %files sections. This is actually useful for singlespec: you get packages called "python-azure-sdk", but the resulting spec file doesn't have a "%files" section for it, only "%files -n python3-azure-sdk" and "%files -n python2-azure-sdk", so you get python2 package, python3 package, but no python- package.) regards m.
Any ideas?
Adrian