On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 09:25:55 +0100, Martin Pluskal wrote:
- %files: expand wildcards to explicit lists
Some people apparently prefer package build to fail whenever a file is added or renamed. I don't force them not to do so in their packages, could they respect my preferences in mine? Apparently not.
Yeah, I prefer wildcards, too. To be honest I already had some bad experience with trusting wildcards - build failing instead of incorrect package being shiped is imho better way to go.
I was also bitten a couple of times, too. But it's a kind of question like whether to enable -i option of rm as default or not.
- reorder tags in specfile header
I'm confused. The previous order was what spec cleaner did. Wasn't it supposed to be The Right Order(TM)? And what happens next time spec cleaner service is run? Is it going to change the order back, masking real changes?
It's annoying, indeed. This is matter of perspective, if you are contributing to multiple packages, reviewing more requests, "uniformity" of packages makes both a bit more easy. To be honest I do not consider packaging to be place where creativity/ uniqueness in packaging style is actually desirable.
Well, in this case, the previous order was the canonical one by spec-cleaner. If the order is "wrong", spec-cleaner should be fixed at first :) Takashi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org