Jan Engelhardt composed on 2015-11-25 13:11 (UTC+0100):
On Wednesday 2015-11-25 12:32, Felix Miata wrote:
- forks need to be considered. Examples: * lomt-raleway-fonts; impallari-raleway-fonts (later renamed) * google inconsolata and inconsolata DZ.
If these outweigh the difficulty caused by their absence, then suffix rather than prefix, so people can find them by the names
Your suggestion is a waste of everybody's time.
Inconsolata and all its variants can already be easily found, even by the hardest novices, through, among other things: - `ls -l *inconsolata*` (on DVD/NFS/FTP) - `zypper se inconsolata` - entering "inconsolata" into http://software.opensuse.org/ because they do a substring search.
Did you read the whole thread? http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-packaging/2015-11/msg00081.html explains what I tried before starting the thread. #1 I don't grok (I wasn't looking on DVD or NFS or FTP), only for files I expected to have been installed from the installed google-noto-fonts package. #2 failed as previously described. #3 requires a web browser with JS, where AFAIK in multi-user.target where I was working no can do. Nothing in what you quoted has anything to do with inconsolata. I was referring to forks, not specific names among what you last wrote. I was looking with zypper and ls for noto generically, not specifically noto sans, resulting in finding only a meta package that does not announce as a meta package. The difficulty of which I wrote was about also includes eye scanning through any list of hundreds or thousands of package names in which are peppered fonts that do not begin with string font. -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org