February 2024 - openSUSE Packaging - openSUSE Mailing Lists

Re: RPM 4.19 - first list of missing user provides
by Andreas Schwab 05 Feb '24

05 Feb '24

On Feb 05 2024, Michal Suchánek wrote: > On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 11:59:24AM +0100, Dominique Leuenberger wrote: >> So far I have found this list: >> >> > grep -P "(user|group)" rebuildpacs.openSUSE\:Factory-standard.yaml | >> sed "s/needed by.*//g" | sort -u > >> - nothing provides group(git) > What requires it, though? You can look it up in https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/openSUSE:Factory:Staging/dashb… -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab(a)suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."

1 0

Re: RPM 4.19 - first list of missing user provides
by Dominique Leuenberger 05 Feb '24

05 Feb '24

On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 10:53 +0100, Michal Suchánek wrote: > On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 11:59:24AM +0100, Dominique Leuenberger > wrote: > > On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 16:02 +0100, Ana Guerrero Lopez via openSUSE > > Factory wrote: > > > Dear community, > > > > > > In case you didn't update your Tumbleweed systems yet, RPM 4.19.1 > > > was > > > accepted earlier this week. > > > > > > As outlined below, some packages will still need updates. > > > > > > Have a nice weekend! > > > > AS iformed by Ana, RPM 4.19 adds a dependency on user/group > > whenever > > the package installs file as non-root. > > > > Factory has just received a larger rebuild due to glibc 2.39 and > > python > > 3.12 addition - which in turn also uncovered a lot of missing > > user/group provides. > > > > So far I have found this list: > > > > > grep -P "(user|group)" rebuildpacs.openSUSE\:Factory- > > > standard.yaml | > > sed "s/needed by.*//g" | sort -u > > > - nothing provides group(git) > What requires it, though? > > zypper se --requires "group(git)" Loading repository data... Reading installed packages... S | Name | Summary | Type --+----------+------------------------------------------+-------- | gitolite | Server for git directory version tracker | package The reson is to be found in gitolite.spec: %define git_user git … %config(noreplace) %attr(640,%{git_user},%{git_user}) %{gitolite_homedir}/.ssh/authorized_keys i.e RPM is supposed to install a file to be owned by user/group git (and, as announced, RPM takes this info to formulate an automatic dependency to ensure that user/group exists). Cheers, Dominique

1 0

False positive: update-alternatives-postun-call-missing in rubygem package?
by Johannes Kastl 04 Feb '24

04 Feb '24

Hi all, I packaged rubygem-krane recently, but could not get rid of one error in rpmlint: > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:ojkastl_buildservice:Branch_de… > [ 11s] ruby3.2-rubygem-krane.x86_64: E: update-alternatives-postun-call-missing > [ 11s] The package does not call update-alternatives --remove in postun phase to > [ 11s] remove all the configuration for each individual --install binary that was > [ 11s] done in postun. Not sure if this is a false positive, as there is a call to update-alternatives in %postun: > %postun > update-alternatives --remove krane %{_bindir}/krane Or is there something wrong with this one (that I copied from another package using update-alternatives? Kind Regards, Johannes P.S.: Have a merry christmas y'all!

3 4