April 2018 - openSUSE Packaging - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-packaging] /mounts/work_src_done/SLE15-STAGING/libstorage-ng not checked in
by idoenmez 19 Apr '18

19 Apr '18

Script 'mail_helper' called by idoenmez Hi opensuse-packaging(a)opensuse.org, /mounts/work_src_done/SLE15-STAGING/libstorage-ng was not checked in by idoenmez for the following reasons: (submitrequest 162285 on https://build.suse.de) changelog not in sequence: Wed Apr 18 12:15:37 UTC 2018 - opensuse-packaging(a)opensuse.org * Wed Apr 18 2018 opensuse-packaging(a)opensuse.org - Translated using Weblate (Swedish) - 3.3.221 Wed Apr 18 13:36:23 UTC 2018 - opensuse-packaging(a)opensuse.org * Wed Apr 18 2018 opensuse-packaging(a)opensuse.org - Translated using Weblate (Japanese) - 3.3.220 - Translated using Weblate (Arabic) - 3.3.219 Please fix with your own tools or try /work/cd/lib/source_validators/helpers/fix_changelog Warning: spec file parser line 88: can't expand %(...) your dist/autobuild team. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

Re: [opensuse-packaging] /mounts/work_src_done/SLE15-STAGING/libstorage-ng not checked in
by Simon Lees 19 Apr '18

19 Apr '18

These still look like there coming to the wrong spot, probably beecause whatever is using opensuse-packaging(a)opensuse.org as an email address should really be using something else. On 19/04/18 00:55, mstrigl wrote: > Script 'mail_helper' called by mstrigl > > Hi snwint(a)suse.com, > /mounts/work_src_done/SLE15-STAGING/libstorage-ng was not checked in by mstrigl for the following reasons: > (submitrequest 162258 on https://build.suse.de) > > please make sure, that the time between changes entries is > different, because this may lead to problems with some scripts. > > > +Wed Apr 18 13:36:23 UTC 2018 - opensuse-packaging(a)opensuse.org > + > +- Translated using Weblate (Japanese) > +- 3.3.220 > + > +-------------------------------------------------------------------- > +Wed Apr 18 13:36:23 UTC 2018 - opensuse-packaging(a)opensuse.org > + > +- Translated using Weblate (Arabic) > +- 3.3.219 > + > +-------------------------------------------------------------------- > +Wed Apr 18 10:50:25 UTC 2018 - freek(a)opensuse.org > + > +- Translated using Weblate (Dutch) > +- 3.3.218 > + > +-------------------------------------------------------------------- > +Wed Apr 18 10:50:25 UTC 2018 - opensuse-packaging(a)opensuse.org > + > +- Translated using Weblate (Czech) > +- 3.3.217 > + > +-------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > your dist/autobuild team. > -- Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30 GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] /mounts/work_src_done/SLE15-STAGING/libstorage-ng not checked in
by mstrigl 18 Apr '18

18 Apr '18

Script 'mail_helper' called by mstrigl Hi snwint(a)suse.com, /mounts/work_src_done/SLE15-STAGING/libstorage-ng was not checked in by mstrigl for the following reasons: (submitrequest 162258 on https://build.suse.de) please make sure, that the time between changes entries is different, because this may lead to problems with some scripts. +Wed Apr 18 13:36:23 UTC 2018 - opensuse-packaging(a)opensuse.org + +- Translated using Weblate (Japanese) +- 3.3.220 + +-------------------------------------------------------------------- +Wed Apr 18 13:36:23 UTC 2018 - opensuse-packaging(a)opensuse.org + +- Translated using Weblate (Arabic) +- 3.3.219 + +-------------------------------------------------------------------- +Wed Apr 18 10:50:25 UTC 2018 - freek(a)opensuse.org + +- Translated using Weblate (Dutch) +- 3.3.218 + +-------------------------------------------------------------------- +Wed Apr 18 10:50:25 UTC 2018 - opensuse-packaging(a)opensuse.org + +- Translated using Weblate (Czech) +- 3.3.217 + +-------------------------------------------------------------------- your dist/autobuild team. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] Automatically verifying files using SHA checksums
by Johannes Weberhofer 16 Apr '18

16 Apr '18

Dear all, is it possible to auto-verify those files using OBS? It's dowumented with PGP signaures but does it work with simple SHA signatures, too? Here is what I download and what I like to be checked: Source0: https://getcomposer.org/download/%{version}/composer.phar Source1: https://getcomposer.org/download/%{version}/composer.phar.sha256sum Best regards -- Johannes Weberhofer Weberhofer GmbH, Austria, Vienna -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] Best practice for _service files
by Matthias Bach 16 Apr '18

16 Apr '18

Hi, I have been trying to use _service files in packages that I wanted to contribute to Factory. I have been following the Open Build Service documentation [1] assuming that this describes a best practice. However, my submit request [2] got declined mentioning > Found _service generate file _service:obs_scm:ntfy-2.6.0.obscpio in checkout. > Please clean this up first.Found _service generate file > _service:obs_scm:ntfy.obsinfo in checkout. Please clean this up first. It seems the usage of obs_scm in tar is incompatible with factory. Should I only use obs_scm locally (in a disabled job) and submit the produces tar.xz? Or is the best practice to run obs_scm locally? Is there any general best practice how to properly build from upstream repos? Kind Regards, Matthias P.S. In case you wonder. I am aware that I messed up that set_version service spec. That I know how to fix, though. [1]: http://openbuildservice.org/help/manuals/obs-reference-guide/ cha.obs.concepts.html#idm139948652572000 assuming [2]: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/596666 -- Dr. Matthias Bach www.marix.org „Der einzige Weg, die Grenzen des Möglichen zu finden, ist ein klein wenig über diese hinaus in das Unmögliche vorzustoßen.“ - Arthur C. Clarke

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] requesting package review: system:snappy/snapd
by Rafael Kitover 12 Apr '18

12 Apr '18

Hi guys, me and zyga are working on the snapd ( system:snappy/snapd ) package and hope to submit it to factory soon (after which we can also package some additional software for it.) If anyone has the time and inclination, I'd love some suggestions for how we can improve the package. Thank you! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] Selecting GCC version
by Matthias Fehring 03 Apr '18

03 Apr '18

Hello, is there a simple way to force the GCC version used to build a package? openSUSE Leap 42.2 for example uses GCC 4.8 as default compiler, but also provides packages for GCC 5.3. Simply using BuildRequires gcc5 pulls gcc5 in but still uses gcc48 to build the package (especially in Build Service). So is there maybe some Buid Service or spec file switch (bcond) to select the used GCC version? Best greetings Matthias Fehring P.S. Not sure if it is a problem with my browser settings, but when I try to search lists.opensuse.org, it is not possible for me to limit the results to a specific list. Even if I set one, I get results from all lists, what makes searching almost impossible, because most results are commit messages. -- Das Gesetz hat zum Schneckengang verdorben, was Adlerflug geworden wäre. (Friedrich Schiller - Die Räuber) www.buschmann23.de GPG-Key: 0x614C3258 GPG Fingerprint: D786 DDF8 4CA9 00BC CDE0 9A5F CCC5 125D 6E87 D4FC

6 13

[opensuse-packaging] Package rebuild not triggered in OBS after build dependency changed
by Michal Srb 03 Apr '18

03 Apr '18

Hi, I am trying to figure out why openSUSE:Factory/Mesa-drivers rebuild was not triggered after version upgrade of openSUSE:Factory/llvm got accepted 12 hours ago. Any advise where to look at? Not sure if it is important, but Mesa-drivers is part of a multi-spec package together with Mesa and llvm is a meta-package that depends on the current major version of llvm, currently llvm6. Thanks, Michal -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 3