April 2011 - openSUSE Packaging - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-packaging] Some headers not found
by Ilya Chernykh 06 Apr '11

06 Apr '11

Hi! I have a package that uses cmake. It uses SDL, Ogre and other libraries. But when compiling it cannot find libraries which are located not in the main include dir (/usr/include), but one or two levels deeper, i.e. in /usr/include/SDL, /usr/include/OGRE, /usr/include/OGRE/Terrain . I was able to add explicit links to some headers, but when a header located in /usr/include/OGRE/Terrain calls another header in the same directory I do not know what to do. Is there a more simple way to make the compiler to know where to search for headers? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

4 5

[opensuse-packaging] confused by e2fsprogs versions
by Greg Freemyer 05 Apr '11

05 Apr '11

All, I have a patch for e2fsprogs 1.41.14 I want to package / test. I see 1.41.14 in the opensuse 11.4 standard repo. But since I'm wanting to build this for factory, I also look there, but I only find a 1.41.11 version and its not in the main repo. Just the filesystems repo. I can link branch the one in 11.4 easy enough, but what I'm see makes no sense to me. http://software.opensuse.org/search?q=e2fsprogs&baseproject=openSUSE%3A11.4… http://software.opensuse.org/search?q=e2fsprogs&baseproject=openSUSE%3AFact… Thanks for clarification Greg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

7 8

[opensuse-packaging] Is there a good sample Kernel Module package?
by Greg Freemyer 05 Apr '11

05 Apr '11

All, I need to package a kernel module targeting factory. I've tried in the past with some small success, but I never found a good reference module to base my specfile etc. off of. Can anyone recommend one? (Or do I need to sent this to the opensuse-kernel list?) Thanks Greg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] dropping licenses
by Stephan Kulow 04 Apr '11

04 Apr '11

Hi, The licenses package is 300KB on the live cd and the only files linked into are gpl licenses - in addition it's very unclear if links to licenses are really ok. So I submitted a fix for all packages in factory I could find using licenses - for some I had to include a license. The licenses package will soon disappear, so please review and forward the requests. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

4 4

[opensuse-packaging] Buildservice problem?
by Stefan Seyfried 03 Apr '11

03 Apr '11

Hi, is there a maintenance window? Where was it announced (so that I could subscribe to the feed)? How long will it take? Generally there seems to be nothing like a status page for openSUSE services. Would be genuinely useful. -- Stefan Seyfried "Dispatch war rocket Ajax to bring back his body!" -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

4 4

[opensuse-packaging] A .desktop file uses icon from another package
by Ilya Chernykh 02 Apr '11

02 Apr '11

Hi! I have a question. I want to a package which heavily uses icons from another one. But the OBS system does not allow to built it: it says "icon file not installed" even though the dependency on a package that contains the necessary icon is included. What can I do to successfully install this package? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

6 7

[opensuse-packaging] Python 3.2 build problems
by Dave Plater 01 Apr '11

01 Apr '11

I'm busy fighting with the python3-base-3.2 build, which seems to be unpredictable atm, due to blender (against the protests of distro packagers) switching to that version. The 11.4 x86_64 build fails in devel:languages:python:Factory but all the others succeed, I've had varying build results by linking home:plater:blender python3-base to home:plater:blender python3 and devel:languages:python:Factory python3, when linked to devel:languages:python:Factory python3 it mimics the devel build but when linked to home:plater:blender python3 I've had complete build failures and all x86_64 failures with i586 successes with a fresh untouched branched python3 after only adding a fedora conditional for BuildRequires first. I understand that the build service servers aren't 100% in fact the connection was down again a few moments ago and up again now, I don't know if this has any effect that can cause such build behaviour? It also builds differently on my local x86_64 11.4 system using rpmbuild. As it stands now, I've added a few build requirements which seemed to be missing and have experienced an i586 failure due to -pg and -fomit-frame-pointer being incompatible and redefining $RPM_OPT_FLAGS omitting -fomit-frame-pointer (without diving into gcc) can this cause problems? It looks like I've a successful build atm but only after changing a few build options. Here is the diff with comments: %build # use rpm_opt_flags +# Redefine opt flags due to error: -pg and -fomit-frame-pointer are incompatible +export RPM_OPT_FLAGS="-fmessage-length=0 -O2 -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -g" export OPT="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" #export OPT="-O0 -g" @@ -201,10 +210,12 @@ --docdir=%{_docdir}/python \ --enable-ipv6 \ --with-fpectl \ - --enable-shared + --enable-shared \ + --with-cxx-main=%{_bindir}/c++ configure started asking for a c++ compiler LD_LIBRARY_PATH=.:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH \ - make %{?_smp_mflags} profile-opt + make %{?_smp_mflags} This is the change that had the most effect on the build succeeding. +# profile-opt %check # test_file fails in autobuild env - "stdin.seek(-1)" wrongly succeeds. probably an issue with autobuild's stdin @@ -244,10 +255,10 @@ # cleanup parts that don't belong for so in _md5 _sha1 _sha256 _sha512; do - rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{sitedir}/lib-dynload/$so.* + rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{sitedir}/lib-dynload/$so.* _md5 and _sha1 don't exist, I haven't checked the others but when I see things missing that existed before I get worried. done for dir in curses dbm sqlite3 tkinter; do - rm -r $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{sitedir}/$dir + rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{sitedir}/$dir done # install site-specific tweaks @@ -277,7 +288,7 @@ # move idle config into /etc install -d -m 755 ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/etc/idle3 -( +( cd ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/%{sitedir}/idlelib/ for file in *.def ; do mv $file ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/etc/idle3/ I use kwrite for spec files and it saves in UTF8 also removes trailing white spaces. I would appreciate expert help with this after which python3-3.2 could hopefully be ready for tumbleweed, blender is about to be 2.57 RC1 and will be released in about a month, the current blender in 11.4 is beta plus svn and would have been newer if the switch to python 3.2 hadn't happened. I think blender is the main consumer of python3 along with a couple of gnome apps. Thanks Dave P -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

2 5

[opensuse-packaging] Re: [obs submit-request 65647] openSUSE:Factory/perl-File-Slurp: declined by saschpe
by Stephan Kulow 01 Apr '11

01 Apr '11

Donnerstag, 31. März 2011 sent speilicke : > State of submit-request #65647 was changed by saschpe: > > new -> declined > > Comment: > description is >400 lines, too long :-) > Where is a limit documented? Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

3 4