On 25.08.2014 13:50, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Mon, 25 Aug 2014 13:40:23 +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
On 25.08.2014 10:31, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Takashi Iwai
writes: At Mon, 25 Aug 2014 09:51:25 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Takashi Iwai
writes: How about just adding factory repo but not publishing it?
What's wrong with publishing it?
People may get confused which repo to use.
That will not add significantly to the confusion.
Not to bright minds like you - but if you follow e.g. KDE mailing lists you will find quickly that no matter how clearly you document it or how much effort you put in finding good names - there are always people confused.
And having a 2nd repo doesn't even add any value IMO - we want only one repo and we want factory, so where is the problem?
The Kernel:stable repo has been (and is) for openSUSE 13.1-based systems, including Tumbleweed. Building only with FACTORY brings a slight danger of breakage on such systems. That's the major concern for switching, AFAIK.
If that danger exists, the theory that Kernel: projects only need one repo is doomed. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org