On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 04:54, Yamaban
My personal preference would be only to put the needed files (see above) in libkde4-{version} and anything else of nepomuk into libkde4-nepomuk-{version}.
Same with akonadi. This should reduce the migrane.
(Yep, I'm NO fan of akonadi / nepomuk, at least I'm honest about. Use it if want, but give us others at least an opt-out without disassembling all of KDE.)
I had a big hate on for Nepomuk in the past.... but I have to say that with the KDE4.7 (running from Factory on 11.4/default in 12.1) I don't notice it anymore. Seems someone has tamed it right down from the headache it used to be. I run KDE4.7/oS12.1 on an EEE netbook and notice no performance impact at all from Nepomuk running. This is where it'd bring the computer almost to a halt when it was indexing.... now.. I had to check to see if I'd disabled it or if it was disabled by default... but it was running quietly in the background. There is an opt-out you know... you can simply turn off the Nepomuk indexing in the KDE config... and it doesn't run anymore - at least not for any system in which I've turned it off. Keep in mind that if you disable or remove Nepomuk, you loose a fair bit of that "extra" functionality and info that can be useful... tagging in KMail, displaying full file metadata in Dolphin etc etc. So... before you go automatically killing Nepomuk in oS12.1 because in an old release of KDE4 it was a system resource hog , give it a chance. In KDE4.7 it's a LOT better, and actually useful. C. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kde+owner@opensuse.org