Feature changed by: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) Feature #308426, revision 4 Title: Update to reiser4 on opensuse 11.3x openSUSE-11.3: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Glenn Doig (doiggl) Description: <pre> see announcement from http://lizards.opensuse.org/2009/11/15/reiser4-for-opensuse-11-2/ built rpms http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/dmitry_serpokryl:/drivers/op... http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/dmitry_serpokryl:/drivers/11... other http://reiser4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page </pre> Discussion: #1: Glenn Doig (doiggl) (2009-12-08 06:24:01) Alse see  -> http://marc.info/?l=reiserfs-devel&m=126021032531371&w=2 + #2: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) (2009-12-08 10:20:38) + I propose to reject this until it's in the upstream kernel and we take + that kernel - and even then only as experimental filesystem. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/308426

Feature changed by: Jeff Mahoney (jeff_mahoney) Feature #308426, revision 7 Title: Update to reiser4 on opensuse 11.3x openSUSE-11.3: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Glenn Doig (doiggl) Description: <pre> see announcement from http://lizards.opensuse.org/2009/11/15/reiser4-for-opensuse-11-2/ built rpms http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/dmitry_serpokryl:/drivers/op... http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/dmitry_serpokryl:/drivers/11... other http://reiser4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page </pre> Discussion: #1: Glenn Doig (doiggl) (2009-12-08 06:24:01) Alse see  -> http://marc.info/?l=reiserfs-devel&m=126021032531371&w=2 #2: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) (2009-12-08 10:20:38) I propose to reject this until it's in the upstream kernel and we take that kernel - and even then only as experimental filesystem. #3: Glenn Doig (doiggl) (2010-01-03 07:04:48) built rpms -> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=reiser4-kmp&project=home% 3Admitry_serpokryl%3Adrivers + #4: Jeff Mahoney (jeff_mahoney) (2010-01-04 09:54:18) + What is the proposal here? If it's just to include the reiser4 KMP, I + don't have any objections do that since there is a maintainer other + than me looking after it. For actually integration with the + distribution, I'm firmly against it. We don't want to add full support + for a file system with an unknown future. We'd either need to drag + around the code (and maintain it) forever or leave users with supported + configurations out in the cold. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/308426

Feature changed by: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) Feature #308426, revision 9 Title: Update to reiser4 on opensuse 11.3x - openSUSE-11.3: Unconfirmed + openSUSE-11.3: Rejected by (a_jaeger) + reject date: 2010-03-02 14:11:48 + reject reason: It's not in the upstream kernel. Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Glenn Doig (doiggl) Description: <pre> see announcement from http://lizards.opensuse.org/2009/11/15/reiser4-for-opensuse-11-2/ built rpms http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/dmitry_serpokryl:/drivers/op... http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/dmitry_serpokryl:/drivers/11... other http://reiser4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page </pre> Discussion: #1: Glenn Doig (doiggl) (2009-12-08 06:24:01) Alse see  -> http://marc.info/?l=reiserfs-devel&m=126021032531371&w=2 #2: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) (2009-12-08 10:20:38) I propose to reject this until it's in the upstream kernel and we take that kernel - and even then only as experimental filesystem. #3: Glenn Doig (doiggl) (2010-01-03 07:04:48) built rpms -> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=reiser4-kmp&project=home% 3Admitry_serpokryl%3Adrivers #4: Jeff Mahoney (jeff_mahoney) (2010-01-04 09:54:18) What is the proposal here? If it's just to include the reiser4 KMP, I don't have any objections do that since there is a maintainer other than me looking after it. For actually integration with the distribution, I'm firmly against it. We don't want to add full support for a file system with an unknown future. We'd either need to drag around the code (and maintain it) forever or leave users with supported configurations out in the cold. #5: Jan Engelhardt (jengelh) (2010-01-09 01:56:17) (reply to #4) By "integration" I suppose you mean making it show up in yast2. I find it reasonable not to show it in yast2 for exactly that argument (uncertain future), but by default only. Let's say, if the user passes a "reiser4" boot param, then yast2 offers it in the dropdown box. Similar to you needing the "xfs" boot parameter on Fedora/anaconda to make XFS selectable. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/308426