[openFATE 306512] Web Services for Management (WS-Man) has official port numbers now
Feature added by: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) Feature #306512, revision 1 Title: Web Services for Management (WS-Man) has official port numbers now openSUSE-11.2: New Priority Requester: Desirable Requested by: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description:
From the openwsman-devel list
From: A_Venkatachalam@Dell.com To: openwsman-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Vivek_Rajendran@Dell.com, Girish_Prakash@Dell.com, Chandrasekhar_P@Dell.com Subject: [Openwsman-devel] Ports for OpenWSMAN Hi Currently OpenWSMAN 2.1 uses 8888 and 8889 as the default HTTPS and HTTP ports respectively. But as per IANA the registered ports for WSMAN are 5985(HTTP) and 5986(HTTPS) http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers wsman 5985/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsman 5985/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsmans 5986/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL wsmans 5986/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL We need to update “openwsman.conf” to make use of these ports by default. Already MS Winrm2.0 is making use of these ports. Thanks, Arun Venkatachalam Dell R & D Centre, Bangalore. Extn - 78973 Business case (Partner benefit): openSUSE.org: Be standards compliant, especially in mixed Windows/Linux enivronments. Discussion: #1: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:12) Changing ports in a SP upgrade might be harmful. Being standards-compatible might outweight the downsides. Needs PM decision ;-) #2: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:56) If we decide to change ports, yast-firewall and documentation might need to be adapted. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306512
Feature changed by: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) Feature #306512, revision 2 Title: Web Services for Management (WS-Man) has official port numbers now - openSUSE-11.2: New + openSUSE-11.2: Evaluation Priority Requester: Desirable Requested by: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: From the openwsman-devel list From: A_Venkatachalam@Dell.com To: openwsman-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Vivek_Rajendran@Dell.com, Girish_Prakash@Dell.com, Chandrasekhar_P@Dell.com Subject: [Openwsman-devel] Ports for OpenWSMAN Hi Currently OpenWSMAN 2.1 uses 8888 and 8889 as the default HTTPS and HTTP ports respectively. But as per IANA the registered ports for WSMAN are 5985(HTTP) and 5986(HTTPS) http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers wsman 5985/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsman 5985/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsmans 5986/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL wsmans 5986/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL We need to update “openwsman.conf” to make use of these ports by default. Already MS Winrm2.0 is making use of these ports. Thanks, Arun Venkatachalam Dell R & D Centre, Bangalore. Extn - 78973 Business case (Partner benefit): openSUSE.org: Be standards compliant, especially in mixed Windows/Linux enivronments. Discussion: #1: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:12) Changing ports in a SP upgrade might be harmful. Being standards- compatible might outweight the downsides. Needs PM decision ;-) #2: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:56) If we decide to change ports, yast-firewall and documentation might need to be adapted. + #3: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) (2009-06-16 15:21:54) (reply to #2) + I suggest to make the change for 11.2 for now only. Federico, do you + agree? -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306512
Feature changed by: Federico Lucifredi (flucifredi) Feature #306512, revision 3 Title: Web Services for Management (WS-Man) has official port numbers now openSUSE-11.2: Evaluation Priority Requester: Desirable Requested by: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: From the openwsman-devel list From: A_Venkatachalam@Dell.com To: openwsman-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Vivek_Rajendran@Dell.com, Girish_Prakash@Dell.com, Chandrasekhar_P@Dell.com Subject: [Openwsman-devel] Ports for OpenWSMAN Hi Currently OpenWSMAN 2.1 uses 8888 and 8889 as the default HTTPS and HTTP ports respectively. But as per IANA the registered ports for WSMAN are 5985(HTTP) and 5986(HTTPS) http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers wsman 5985/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsman 5985/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsmans 5986/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL wsmans 5986/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL We need to update “openwsman.conf” to make use of these ports by default. Already MS Winrm2.0 is making use of these ports. Thanks, Arun Venkatachalam Dell R & D Centre, Bangalore. Extn - 78973 Business case (Partner benefit): openSUSE.org: Be standards compliant, especially in mixed Windows/Linux enivronments. Discussion: #1: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:12) Changing ports in a SP upgrade might be harmful. Being standards- compatible might outweight the downsides. Needs PM decision ;-) #2: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:56) If we decide to change ports, yast-firewall and documentation might need to be adapted. #3: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) (2009-06-16 15:21:54) (reply to #2) I suggest to make the change for 11.2 for now only. Federico, do you agree? + #4: Federico Lucifredi (flucifredi) (2009-06-16 20:02:36) + I do. But I have web-client only right now so I cannot check off th + needinfo :) -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306512
Feature changed by: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) Feature #306512, revision 11 - Title: Web Services for Management (WS-Man) has official port numbers - now + Title: CIM: Web Services for Management (WS-Man) has official port + numbers now openSUSE-11.2: Evaluation Priority Requester: Desirable Requested by: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: From the openwsman-devel list From: A_Venkatachalam@Dell.com To: openwsman-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Vivek_Rajendran@Dell.com, Girish_Prakash@Dell.com, Chandrasekhar_P@Dell.com Subject: [Openwsman-devel] Ports for OpenWSMAN Hi Currently OpenWSMAN 2.1 uses 8888 and 8889 as the default HTTPS and HTTP ports respectively. But as per IANA the registered ports for WSMAN are 5985(HTTP) and 5986(HTTPS) http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers wsman 5985/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsman 5985/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsmans 5986/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL wsmans 5986/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL We need to update “openwsman.conf” to make use of these ports by default. Already MS Winrm2.0 is making use of these ports. Thanks, Arun Venkatachalam Dell R & D Centre, Bangalore. Extn - 78973 Business case (Partner benefit): openSUSE.org: Be standards compliant, especially in mixed Windows/Linux enivronments. Discussion: #1: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:12) Changing ports in a SP upgrade might be harmful. Being standards- compatible might outweight the downsides. Needs PM decision ;-) #2: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:56) If we decide to change ports, yast-firewall and documentation might need to be adapted. #3: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) (2009-06-16 15:21:54) (reply to #2) I suggest to make the change for 11.2 for now only. Federico, do you agree? #4: Federico Lucifredi (flucifredi) (2009-06-16 20:02:36) I do. But I have web-client only right now so I cannot check off th needinfo :) + #7: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-08-24 13:07:06) + yast firewall module should include "ws-management" with tcp port 5985 + for http and 5986 for https + btw, I'm not aware of UDP being used for ws-management. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306512
Feature changed by: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) Feature #306512, revision 13 Title: CIM: Web Services for Management (WS-Man) has official port numbers now openSUSE-11.2: Evaluation Priority Requester: Desirable + Projectmanager: Mandatory Requested by: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: From the openwsman-devel list From: A_Venkatachalam@Dell.com To: openwsman-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Vivek_Rajendran@Dell.com, Girish_Prakash@Dell.com, Chandrasekhar_P@Dell.com Subject: [Openwsman-devel] Ports for OpenWSMAN Hi Currently OpenWSMAN 2.1 uses 8888 and 8889 as the default HTTPS and HTTP ports respectively. But as per IANA the registered ports for WSMAN are 5985(HTTP) and 5986(HTTPS) http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers wsman 5985/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsman 5985/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsmans 5986/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL wsmans 5986/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL We need to update “openwsman.conf” to make use of these ports by default. Already MS Winrm2.0 is making use of these ports. Thanks, Arun Venkatachalam Dell R & D Centre, Bangalore. Extn - 78973 Business case (Partner benefit): openSUSE.org: Be standards compliant, especially in mixed Windows/Linux enivronments. Discussion: #1: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:12) Changing ports in a SP upgrade might be harmful. Being standards- compatible might outweight the downsides. Needs PM decision ;-) #2: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:56) If we decide to change ports, yast-firewall and documentation might need to be adapted. #3: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) (2009-06-16 15:21:54) (reply to #2) I suggest to make the change for 11.2 for now only. Federico, do you agree? #4: Federico Lucifredi (flucifredi) (2009-06-16 20:02:36) I do. But I have web-client only right now so I cannot check off th needinfo :) #7: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-08-24 13:07:06) yast firewall module should include "ws-management" with tcp port 5985 for http and 5986 for https btw, I'm not aware of UDP being used for ws-management. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306512
Feature changed by: Jiri Srain (jsrain) Feature #306512, revision 17 Title: CIM: Web Services for Management (WS-Man) has official port numbers now openSUSE-11.2: Evaluation Priority Requester: Desirable Projectmanager: Mandatory Requested by: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: From the openwsman-devel list From: A_Venkatachalam@Dell.com To: openwsman-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Vivek_Rajendran@Dell.com, Girish_Prakash@Dell.com, Chandrasekhar_P@Dell.com Subject: [Openwsman-devel] Ports for OpenWSMAN Hi Currently OpenWSMAN 2.1 uses 8888 and 8889 as the default HTTPS and HTTP ports respectively. But as per IANA the registered ports for WSMAN are 5985(HTTP) and 5986(HTTPS) http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers wsman 5985/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsman 5985/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsmans 5986/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL wsmans 5986/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL We need to update “openwsman.conf” to make use of these ports by default. Already MS Winrm2.0 is making use of these ports. Thanks, Arun Venkatachalam Dell R & D Centre, Bangalore. Extn - 78973 Business case (Partner benefit): openSUSE.org: Be standards compliant, especially in mixed Windows/Linux enivronments. Discussion: #1: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:12) Changing ports in a SP upgrade might be harmful. Being standards- compatible might outweight the downsides. Needs PM decision ;-) #2: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:56) If we decide to change ports, yast-firewall and documentation might need to be adapted. #3: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) (2009-06-16 15:21:54) (reply to #2) I suggest to make the change for 11.2 for now only. Federico, do you agree? #4: Federico Lucifredi (flucifredi) (2009-06-16 20:02:36) I do. But I have web-client only right now so I cannot check off th needinfo :) #7: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-08-24 13:07:06) yast firewall module should include "ws-management" with tcp port 5985 for http and 5986 for https btw, I'm not aware of UDP being used for ws-management. + #10: Jiri Srain (jsrain) (2009-08-26 14:09:59) + The package can define the port itself, there are no changes in the + YaST firewall module needed. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306512
Feature changed by: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) Feature #306512, revision 18 Title: CIM: Web Services for Management (WS-Man) has official port numbers now openSUSE-11.2: Evaluation Priority Requester: Desirable Projectmanager: Mandatory Requested by: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: From the openwsman-devel list From: A_Venkatachalam@Dell.com To: openwsman-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Vivek_Rajendran@Dell.com, Girish_Prakash@Dell.com, Chandrasekhar_P@Dell.com Subject: [Openwsman-devel] Ports for OpenWSMAN Hi Currently OpenWSMAN 2.1 uses 8888 and 8889 as the default HTTPS and HTTP ports respectively. But as per IANA the registered ports for WSMAN are 5985(HTTP) and 5986(HTTPS) http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers wsman 5985/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsman 5985/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsmans 5986/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL wsmans 5986/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL We need to update “openwsman.conf” to make use of these ports by default. Already MS Winrm2.0 is making use of these ports. Thanks, Arun Venkatachalam Dell R & D Centre, Bangalore. Extn - 78973 Business case (Partner benefit): openSUSE.org: Be standards compliant, especially in mixed Windows/Linux enivronments. Discussion: #1: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:12) Changing ports in a SP upgrade might be harmful. Being standards- compatible might outweight the downsides. Needs PM decision ;-) #2: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:56) If we decide to change ports, yast-firewall and documentation might need to be adapted. #3: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) (2009-06-16 15:21:54) (reply to #2) I suggest to make the change for 11.2 for now only. Federico, do you agree? #4: Federico Lucifredi (flucifredi) (2009-06-16 20:02:36) I do. But I have web-client only right now so I cannot check off th needinfo :) #7: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-08-24 13:07:06) yast firewall module should include "ws-management" with tcp port 5985 for http and 5986 for https btw, I'm not aware of UDP being used for ws-management. #10: Jiri Srain (jsrain) (2009-08-26 14:09:59) The package can define the port itself, there are no changes in the YaST firewall module needed. + #11: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-08-26 14:34:18) (reply to #10) + Great ! How's this done ? Wiki url ? -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306512
Feature changed by: Klaas Freitag (kfreitag) Feature #306512, revision 19 Title: CIM: Web Services for Management (WS-Man) has official port numbers now openSUSE-11.2: Evaluation Priority Requester: Desirable Projectmanager: Mandatory Requested by: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: From the openwsman-devel list From: A_Venkatachalam@Dell.com To: openwsman-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Vivek_Rajendran@Dell.com, Girish_Prakash@Dell.com, Chandrasekhar_P@Dell.com Subject: [Openwsman-devel] Ports for OpenWSMAN Hi Currently OpenWSMAN 2.1 uses 8888 and 8889 as the default HTTPS and HTTP ports respectively. But as per IANA the registered ports for WSMAN are 5985(HTTP) and 5986(HTTPS) http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers wsman 5985/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsman 5985/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsmans 5986/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL wsmans 5986/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL We need to update “openwsman.conf” to make use of these ports by default. Already MS Winrm2.0 is making use of these ports. Thanks, Arun Venkatachalam Dell R & D Centre, Bangalore. Extn - 78973 Business case (Partner benefit): openSUSE.org: Be standards compliant, especially in mixed Windows/Linux enivronments. Discussion: #1: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:12) Changing ports in a SP upgrade might be harmful. Being standards- compatible might outweight the downsides. Needs PM decision ;-) #2: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:56) If we decide to change ports, yast-firewall and documentation might need to be adapted. #3: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) (2009-06-16 15:21:54) (reply to #2) I suggest to make the change for 11.2 for now only. Federico, do you agree? #4: Federico Lucifredi (flucifredi) (2009-06-16 20:02:36) I do. But I have web-client only right now so I cannot check off th needinfo :) #7: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-08-24 13:07:06) yast firewall module should include "ws-management" with tcp port 5985 for http and 5986 for https btw, I'm not aware of UDP being used for ws-management. #10: Jiri Srain (jsrain) (2009-08-26 14:09:59) The package can define the port itself, there are no changes in the YaST firewall module needed. #11: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-08-26 14:34:18) (reply to #10) Great ! How's this done ? Wiki url ? + #12: Klaas Freitag (kfreitag) (2009-09-02 17:42:11) + CIM stuff IMO needs to be decided by the appliance department. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306512
Feature changed by: Jiri Srain (jsrain) Feature #306512, revision 20 Title: CIM: Web Services for Management (WS-Man) has official port numbers now openSUSE-11.2: Evaluation Priority Requester: Desirable Projectmanager: Mandatory Requested by: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: From the openwsman-devel list From: A_Venkatachalam@Dell.com To: openwsman-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Vivek_Rajendran@Dell.com, Girish_Prakash@Dell.com, Chandrasekhar_P@Dell.com Subject: [Openwsman-devel] Ports for OpenWSMAN Hi Currently OpenWSMAN 2.1 uses 8888 and 8889 as the default HTTPS and HTTP ports respectively. But as per IANA the registered ports for WSMAN are 5985(HTTP) and 5986(HTTPS) http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers wsman 5985/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsman 5985/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsmans 5986/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL wsmans 5986/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL We need to update “openwsman.conf” to make use of these ports by default. Already MS Winrm2.0 is making use of these ports. Thanks, Arun Venkatachalam Dell R & D Centre, Bangalore. Extn - 78973 Business case (Partner benefit): openSUSE.org: Be standards compliant, especially in mixed Windows/Linux enivronments. Discussion: #1: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:12) Changing ports in a SP upgrade might be harmful. Being standards- compatible might outweight the downsides. Needs PM decision ;-) #2: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:56) If we decide to change ports, yast-firewall and documentation might need to be adapted. #3: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) (2009-06-16 15:21:54) (reply to #2) I suggest to make the change for 11.2 for now only. Federico, do you agree? #4: Federico Lucifredi (flucifredi) (2009-06-16 20:02:36) I do. But I have web-client only right now so I cannot check off th needinfo :) #7: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-08-24 13:07:06) yast firewall module should include "ws-management" with tcp port 5985 for http and 5986 for https btw, I'm not aware of UDP being used for ws-management. #10: Jiri Srain (jsrain) (2009-08-26 14:09:59) The package can define the port itself, there are no changes in the YaST firewall module needed. #11: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-08-26 14:34:18) (reply to #10) Great ! How's this done ? Wiki url ? #12: Klaas Freitag (kfreitag) (2009-09-02 17:42:11) CIM stuff IMO needs to be decided by the appliance department. + #13: Jiri Srain (jsrain) (2009-09-03 13:13:04) (reply to #12) + There is nothing to decide - it's just about packaging the port + description for firewall, which is defined as a file provided by the + package. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306512
Feature changed by: Klaas Freitag (kfreitag) Feature #306512, revision 21 Title: CIM: Web Services for Management (WS-Man) has official port numbers now - openSUSE-11.2: Evaluation + openSUSE-11.2: Candidate Priority Requester: Desirable Projectmanager: Mandatory Requested by: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: From the openwsman-devel list From: A_Venkatachalam@Dell.com To: openwsman-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Vivek_Rajendran@Dell.com, Girish_Prakash@Dell.com, Chandrasekhar_P@Dell.com Subject: [Openwsman-devel] Ports for OpenWSMAN Hi Currently OpenWSMAN 2.1 uses 8888 and 8889 as the default HTTPS and HTTP ports respectively. But as per IANA the registered ports for WSMAN are 5985(HTTP) and 5986(HTTPS) http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers wsman 5985/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsman 5985/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsmans 5986/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL wsmans 5986/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL We need to update “openwsman.conf” to make use of these ports by default. Already MS Winrm2.0 is making use of these ports. Thanks, Arun Venkatachalam Dell R & D Centre, Bangalore. Extn - 78973 Business case (Partner benefit): openSUSE.org: Be standards compliant, especially in mixed Windows/Linux enivronments. Discussion: #1: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:12) Changing ports in a SP upgrade might be harmful. Being standards- compatible might outweight the downsides. Needs PM decision ;-) #2: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:56) If we decide to change ports, yast-firewall and documentation might need to be adapted. #3: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) (2009-06-16 15:21:54) (reply to #2) I suggest to make the change for 11.2 for now only. Federico, do you agree? #4: Federico Lucifredi (flucifredi) (2009-06-16 20:02:36) I do. But I have web-client only right now so I cannot check off th needinfo :) #7: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-08-24 13:07:06) yast firewall module should include "ws-management" with tcp port 5985 for http and 5986 for https btw, I'm not aware of UDP being used for ws-management. #10: Jiri Srain (jsrain) (2009-08-26 14:09:59) The package can define the port itself, there are no changes in the YaST firewall module needed. #11: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-08-26 14:34:18) (reply to #10) Great ! How's this done ? Wiki url ? #12: Klaas Freitag (kfreitag) (2009-09-02 17:42:11) CIM stuff IMO needs to be decided by the appliance department. #13: Jiri Srain (jsrain) (2009-09-03 13:13:04) (reply to #12) There is nothing to decide - it's just about packaging the port description for firewall, which is defined as a file provided by the package. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306512
Feature changed by: Christoph Thiel (cthiel1) Feature #306512, revision 22 Title: CIM: Web Services for Management (WS-Man) has official port numbers now - openSUSE-11.2: Candidate + openSUSE-11.2: Done Priority Requester: Desirable Projectmanager: Mandatory Requested by: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: From the openwsman-devel list From: A_Venkatachalam@Dell.com To: openwsman-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Vivek_Rajendran@Dell.com, Girish_Prakash@Dell.com, Chandrasekhar_P@Dell.com Subject: [Openwsman-devel] Ports for OpenWSMAN Hi Currently OpenWSMAN 2.1 uses 8888 and 8889 as the default HTTPS and HTTP ports respectively. But as per IANA the registered ports for WSMAN are 5985(HTTP) and 5986(HTTPS) http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers wsman 5985/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsman 5985/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsmans 5986/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL wsmans 5986/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL We need to update “openwsman.conf” to make use of these ports by default. Already MS Winrm2.0 is making use of these ports. Thanks, Arun Venkatachalam Dell R & D Centre, Bangalore. Extn - 78973 Business case (Partner benefit): openSUSE.org: Be standards compliant, especially in mixed Windows/Linux enivronments. Discussion: #1: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:12) Changing ports in a SP upgrade might be harmful. Being standards- compatible might outweight the downsides. Needs PM decision ;-) #2: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:56) If we decide to change ports, yast-firewall and documentation might need to be adapted. #3: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) (2009-06-16 15:21:54) (reply to #2) I suggest to make the change for 11.2 for now only. Federico, do you agree? #4: Federico Lucifredi (flucifredi) (2009-06-16 20:02:36) I do. But I have web-client only right now so I cannot check off th needinfo :) #7: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-08-24 13:07:06) yast firewall module should include "ws-management" with tcp port 5985 for http and 5986 for https btw, I'm not aware of UDP being used for ws-management. #10: Jiri Srain (jsrain) (2009-08-26 14:09:59) The package can define the port itself, there are no changes in the YaST firewall module needed. #11: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-08-26 14:34:18) (reply to #10) Great ! How's this done ? Wiki url ? #12: Klaas Freitag (kfreitag) (2009-09-02 17:42:11) CIM stuff IMO needs to be decided by the appliance department. #13: Jiri Srain (jsrain) (2009-09-03 13:13:04) (reply to #12) There is nothing to decide - it's just about packaging the port description for firewall, which is defined as a file provided by the package. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306512
Feature changed by: Michal Hrusecky (-miska-) Feature #306512, revision 23 Title: CIM: Web Services for Management (WS-Man) has official port numbers now openSUSE-11.2: Done Priority Requester: Desirable Projectmanager: Mandatory Requested by: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: From the openwsman-devel list From: A_Venkatachalam@Dell.com To: openwsman-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Vivek_Rajendran@Dell.com, Girish_Prakash@Dell.com, Chandrasekhar_P@Dell.com Subject: [Openwsman-devel] Ports for OpenWSMAN Hi Currently OpenWSMAN 2.1 uses 8888 and 8889 as the default HTTPS and HTTP ports respectively. But as per IANA the registered ports for WSMAN are 5985(HTTP) and 5986(HTTPS) http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers wsman 5985/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsman 5985/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsmans 5986/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL wsmans 5986/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL We need to update “openwsman.conf” to make use of these ports by default. Already MS Winrm2.0 is making use of these ports. Thanks, Arun Venkatachalam Dell R & D Centre, Bangalore. Extn - 78973 Business case (Partner benefit): openSUSE.org: Be standards compliant, especially in mixed Windows/Linux enivronments. Discussion: #1: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:12) Changing ports in a SP upgrade might be harmful. Being standards- compatible might outweight the downsides. Needs PM decision ;-) #2: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:56) If we decide to change ports, yast-firewall and documentation might need to be adapted. #3: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) (2009-06-16 15:21:54) (reply to #2) I suggest to make the change for 11.2 for now only. Federico, do you agree? #4: Federico Lucifredi (flucifredi) (2009-06-16 20:02:36) I do. But I have web-client only right now so I cannot check off th needinfo :) #7: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-08-24 13:07:06) yast firewall module should include "ws-management" with tcp port 5985 for http and 5986 for https btw, I'm not aware of UDP being used for ws-management. #10: Jiri Srain (jsrain) (2009-08-26 14:09:59) The package can define the port itself, there are no changes in the YaST firewall module needed. #11: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-08-26 14:34:18) (reply to #10) Great ! How's this done ? Wiki url ? #12: Klaas Freitag (kfreitag) (2009-09-02 17:42:11) CIM stuff IMO needs to be decided by the appliance department. #13: Jiri Srain (jsrain) (2009-09-03 13:13:04) (reply to #12) There is nothing to decide - it's just about packaging the port description for firewall, which is defined as a file provided by the package. + #14: Michal Hrusecky (-miska-) (2009-11-19 12:17:57) + Updated package sent to SLE11-SP1 via IBS as sr#2863. Port numbers has + been fixed in 11.2 some time ago already. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306512
Feature changed by: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) Feature #306512, revision 24 Title: CIM: Web Services for Management (WS-Man) has official port numbers now openSUSE-11.2: Done Priority Requester: Desirable Projectmanager: Mandatory Requested by: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: From the openwsman-devel list From: A_Venkatachalam@Dell.com To: openwsman-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Vivek_Rajendran@Dell.com, Girish_Prakash@Dell.com, Chandrasekhar_P@Dell.com Subject: [Openwsman-devel] Ports for OpenWSMAN Hi Currently OpenWSMAN 2.1 uses 8888 and 8889 as the default HTTPS and HTTP ports respectively. But as per IANA the registered ports for WSMAN are 5985(HTTP) and 5986(HTTPS) http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers wsman 5985/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsman 5985/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsmans 5986/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL wsmans 5986/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL We need to update “openwsman.conf” to make use of these ports by default. Already MS Winrm2.0 is making use of these ports. Thanks, Arun Venkatachalam Dell R & D Centre, Bangalore. Extn - 78973 Business case (Partner benefit): openSUSE.org: Be standards compliant, especially in mixed Windows/Linux enivronments. Discussion: #1: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:12) Changing ports in a SP upgrade might be harmful. Being standards- compatible might outweight the downsides. Needs PM decision ;-) #2: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:56) If we decide to change ports, yast-firewall and documentation might need to be adapted. #3: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) (2009-06-16 15:21:54) (reply to #2) I suggest to make the change for 11.2 for now only. Federico, do you agree? #4: Federico Lucifredi (flucifredi) (2009-06-16 20:02:36) I do. But I have web-client only right now so I cannot check off th needinfo :) #7: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-08-24 13:07:06) yast firewall module should include "ws-management" with tcp port 5985 for http and 5986 for https btw, I'm not aware of UDP being used for ws-management. #10: Jiri Srain (jsrain) (2009-08-26 14:09:59) The package can define the port itself, there are no changes in the YaST firewall module needed. #11: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-08-26 14:34:18) (reply to #10) Great ! How's this done ? Wiki url ? #12: Klaas Freitag (kfreitag) (2009-09-02 17:42:11) CIM stuff IMO needs to be decided by the appliance department. #13: Jiri Srain (jsrain) (2009-09-03 13:13:04) (reply to #12) There is nothing to decide - it's just about packaging the port description for firewall, which is defined as a file provided by the package. #14: Michal Hrusecky (-miska-) (2009-11-19 12:17:57) Updated package sent to SLE11-SP1 via IBS as sr#2863. Port numbers has been fixed in 11.2 some time ago already. + #15: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-11-19 13:24:48) (reply to #14) + JFYI, openwsman 2.2.1 (covered by another fate entry) is going to be + released before feature freeze. I will submit the package. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306512
Feature changed by: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) Feature #306512, revision 25 Title: CIM: Web Services for Management (WS-Man) has official port numbers now openSUSE-11.2: Done Priority Requester: Desirable Projectmanager: Mandatory Requested by: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: From the openwsman-devel list From: A_Venkatachalam@Dell.com To: openwsman-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Vivek_Rajendran@Dell.com, Girish_Prakash@Dell.com, Chandrasekhar_P@Dell.com Subject: [Openwsman-devel] Ports for OpenWSMAN Hi Currently OpenWSMAN 2.1 uses 8888 and 8889 as the default HTTPS and HTTP ports respectively. But as per IANA the registered ports for WSMAN are 5985(HTTP) and 5986(HTTPS) http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers wsman 5985/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsman 5985/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP wsmans 5986/tcp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL wsmans 5986/udp WBEM WS-Management HTTP over TLS/SSL We need to update “openwsman.conf” to make use of these ports by default. Already MS Winrm2.0 is making use of these ports. Thanks, Arun Venkatachalam Dell R & D Centre, Bangalore. Extn - 78973 Business case (Partner benefit): openSUSE.org: Be standards compliant, especially in mixed Windows/Linux enivronments. Discussion: #1: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:12) Changing ports in a SP upgrade might be harmful. Being standards- compatible might outweight the downsides. Needs PM decision ;-) #2: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-06-15 11:51:56) If we decide to change ports, yast-firewall and documentation might need to be adapted. #3: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) (2009-06-16 15:21:54) (reply to #2) I suggest to make the change for 11.2 for now only. Federico, do you agree? #4: Federico Lucifredi (flucifredi) (2009-06-16 20:02:36) I do. But I have web-client only right now so I cannot check off th needinfo :) #7: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-08-24 13:07:06) yast firewall module should include "ws-management" with tcp port 5985 for http and 5986 for https btw, I'm not aware of UDP being used for ws-management. #10: Jiri Srain (jsrain) (2009-08-26 14:09:59) The package can define the port itself, there are no changes in the YaST firewall module needed. #11: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-08-26 14:34:18) (reply to #10) Great ! How's this done ? Wiki url ? #12: Klaas Freitag (kfreitag) (2009-09-02 17:42:11) CIM stuff IMO needs to be decided by the appliance department. #13: Jiri Srain (jsrain) (2009-09-03 13:13:04) (reply to #12) There is nothing to decide - it's just about packaging the port description for firewall, which is defined as a file provided by the package. #14: Michal Hrusecky (-miska-) (2009-11-19 12:17:57) Updated package sent to SLE11-SP1 via IBS as sr#2863. Port numbers has been fixed in 11.2 some time ago already. #15: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-11-19 13:24:48) (reply to #14) JFYI, openwsman 2.2.1 (covered by another fate entry) is going to be released before feature freeze. I will submit the package. + #16: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2009-11-20 15:06:43) (reply to #15) + See also FATE #307497 -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306512
participants (1)
-
fate_noreply＠suse.de