1 Nov
2015
1 Nov
'15
21:09
On 2015-11-01 22:00, Johannes Kastl wrote:
Am 01.11.15 schrieb Daniel Fuhrmann:
The one who knews the sub-repos of packman is able to set it manually. The one who "needs" packman and "needs" clicky clicky is safer with the whole repo i think
-1
I would vote for providing the sub-repos.
I have seen people having packman defined several times. If the subrepos are provided that easy, people will have all of them defined, plus the complete one. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 13.1 x86_64 "Bottle" at Telcontar)