On 2017-04-19 13:07, Vojtěch Zeisek wrote:
Dne středa 19. dubna 2017 12:16:16 CEST, Carlos E. R. napsal(a):
Thats why I think we should keep a default.
And how do you know that you are making the right choice for /them/?
Yes, but how can *they decide*? In this point I'd argue to select the DE *probably* fitting needs of most of people.
I think that most people are capable of thinking a little :-) "Just" find a way to properly describe each desktop, pros and cons, and let them decide what is best for them. It they can't, offer a button to make a choice for them.
For instance, the current default (KDE) is terrible for people like me that want things simple. KDE is very complex. Beautiful, yes, but bewildering. I also find the Gnome way too difficult to understand.
I do consider KDE simple in terms of finding way how to use it. GNOME 3 is much simpler in terms of how many things You can influence (e.g. in settings), but I find it terribly non-understandable in terms how to work with it. So what do You mean by "simple"? :-)
XFCE is simple :-) Traditional menu system, no surprises, no bloatware. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 42.2 x86_64 "Malachite" at Telcontar)