On 04/20/2017 07:22 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Thursday 2017-04-20 10:13, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
On 20.04.2017 08:59, Vojtěch Zeisek wrote:
This is not the case. You install on ~7 years old netbook with Intel Atom and 2 GB RAM. KDE/GNOME won't run smooth there. This is place for e.g. XFCE to take the job. Rest can be the same (Firefox, LO, ...). This idea has nothing to do with servers.
But the effect is the same: you do three times the same installation and get three totally different results. Probably even with autoyast and the same xml config you get three totally different installations. Highly confusing.
Well of course that should not happen - not with autoyast at least.
I think the entire topic is overblown already. We are targeting power users (says Richard, concur by me), so we do not need an installation routine that is unnecessary complex and overweight in code just trying to figure out what's best for a particular system more than it has to.
I disagree with this idea, its ok to target and focus on power users, but we shouldn't do it to the extent where we don't even consider new users. Yast and a good installer mean that openSUSE Leap is still a really good choice for New users, in my opinion we should market this more even if its not our main focus. I will also agree that pressing the same buttons in the same order on 2 different machines should provide the same results though. -- Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30 GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B