On 10/17/19 10:03 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Thursday 2019-10-17 13:19, Simon Lees wrote:
On 10/17/19 9:43 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Thursday 2019-10-17 11:30, Simon Lees wrote:
Based upon this established process and my recollection of the prior responses, I have come to the conclusion that my position has a larger share of supporters. This is presented in the overview.
Yes but in this case you didn't count the implicit non responses, I don't expect that everyone who agree's with a proposal such as removing rpm groups needs to add a +1 to the email thread
By your very argumentation, you also should not expect that everyone who agrees with my proposition needs to add a +1 to the thread. So it's fair to say that you can't just count 490 non-respondents as agreements for a removal.
I would expect that people who object to a proposal should raise there objections as a small number of people did.
And that's what I did for the removal proposal. So, we're even?
As I said in a previous email i'm still waiting for a full detailed proposal email for the new tags and then people can start to provide feedback or object, but as everyone agrees there is enough issues with the current system that it needs replacing, if people agree to some form of replacement then what we do in between with the existing data that has lots of flaws is another question. There is already multiple people suggesting that its at the point that it should be scrapped and start again. -- Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30 GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B