Per Jessen wrote:
Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
2011/4/11 jdd
: I just want to say that we should change a bit the release agenda. It's pretty evident that nobody can use factory seriously before late in the process. It's also obvious from my experience that nobody used some applications (if somebody did, a non starting application should have been noted).
How would you modify the release agenda to make more people test?
I would add some quality assurance criteria that unless met would postpone a release. For example:
criteria 1: "X bugs per Y changes have been reported". criteria 2: "X bugs per Y changes have been closed with status=MM" criteria 3: "X bugs per Y changes have been closed with status=NN" criteria 4: "X bugs per Y changes are currently open"
I wanted to add - obviously, a set of QA criteria does not automagically "make more people test". What it does is put some more focus on the ones actively testing - "the testers are holding back alpha4", "openSUSE xx.y RC1" being delayed due to lack of testing". However, anyone waiting for alpha4 or a release-candidate would him/herself be a tester, so .... -- Per Jessen, Zürich (20.1°C) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org