On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 11:26 +0100, Dinar Valeev wrote:
Ups, my bad.. that's meant to be 'docky'
Those apps all have the same name nowadays :)
Making a whole gnome depend on mono is it worth for just couple of packages?
Cheers, Dominique
GNOME does not depend on mono.. but a couple of libraries do offer bindings and, yes, it IS worthy to provide this stuff.
if you really want to split this out, then the way would be to build the same library twice: once with mono and then a 2nd .spec file which only builds the mono bindings.. but you will waste much more build cycle, so not worth it at all (especially as most libs will not allow to 'only build the bindings' - the core component always need to be built and in case of the 2nd .spec file be ignored. This is done for example in libproxy/libproxy-plugins So, IIUC
We want to build bindings with Mono by default for KDE to be prepared to the fact some user will come and build 'third party' against libkolabxml. And we want to be prepared for that. for GNOME we want this for banshee and tomboy? btw. There is another pacakge.. graphviz-plugins which is a dependency for libzypp. But SR for it was accepted before I started this discussion.
Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger
-- Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org