March 2012 - openSUSE Factory - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-factory] 12.2 M2, missing dependency
by Constant Brouerius van Nidek 23 Mar '12

23 Mar '12

Tried to install KMail (kmail-4.8.0-1.4.i586) on my newly and fresh installed 12.2 M2 (0258) but ran into a missing dependency. Nothing provides kdepim4-runtime. Where do I find this kdepim4-runtime? -- Linux User 183145 using KDE4 on a Pentium IV , powered by openSUSE 12.1 (i586) Kernel: 3.3.0-16-desktop KDE Development Platform: 4.8.1 (4.8.1) "release 483") 17:09pm up 2:24, 3 users, load average: 0.92, 1.01, 0.66 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-factory] iwlwifi fails to find firmware
by hrvojes 23 Mar '12

23 Mar '12

After todays upgrade , and a reboot i can't get my wireless on: [ 909.336865] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: Detected Intel(R) WiFi Link 5100 AGN, ... [ 909.362954] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: request for firmware file 'iwlwifi-5000-5.ucode' failed. [ 909.364857] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: request for firmware file 'iwlwifi-5000-4.ucode' failed. [ 909.366872] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: request for firmware file 'iwlwifi-5000-3.ucode' failed. [ 909.368583] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: request for firmware file 'iwlwifi-5000-2.ucode' failed. [ 909.372292] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: request for firmware file 'iwlwifi-5000-1.ucode' failed. [ 909.372300] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: no suitable firmware found! rpm -q kernel-firmware kernel-firmware-20111025git-56.1.noarch ls /lib/firmware/ | grep iw LICENCE.iwlwifi_firmware iwlwifi-100-5.ucode iwlwifi-1000-3.ucode iwlwifi-1000-5.ucode iwlwifi-3945-2.ucode iwlwifi-4965-1.ucode iwlwifi-4965-2.ucode iwlwifi-5000-1.ucode iwlwifi-5000-2.ucode iwlwifi-5000-5.ucode iwlwifi-5150-2.ucode iwlwifi-6000-4.ucode iwlwifi-6000g2a-5.ucode iwlwifi-6000g2b-5.ucode iwlwifi-6050-4.ucode iwlwifi-6050-5.ucode Any ideas? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

4 4

[opensuse-factory] Deprecated projects
by Graham Anderson 23 Mar '12

23 Mar '12

Greetings list, Why do we allocate high priority builders to deprecated projects such as KDE3? It's frustrating for me to have my builds be scheduled behind this deprecated project. Please remove KDE3 from factory and let it live in it's own namespace. KDE3 in factory is a taint on our openSUSE project. Cheers the noo, Graham

14 36

[opensuse-factory] 12.2 M2, Packagekit blockt zypper and Yast Software management
by Constant Brouerius van Nidek 23 Mar '12

23 Mar '12

Downloaded the Build 0258 DVD and installed the 12.2 on one of the partitions. Installation was without problems. Update after installation was done without problem. Problem started after I wanted to install KMail. Both Zypper and Yast refused to do their work, complaining about a running packagekit. The offered choice to stop the package kit did not work. Was able to start the software management wit a konsole with package-manager. Known problem? -- Linux User 183145 using KDE4 on a Pentium IV , powered by openSUSE 12.1 (i586) Kernel: 3.3.0-16-desktop KDE Development Platform: 4.8.1 (4.8.1) "release 483") 15:55pm up 1:10, 3 users, load average: 1.21, 0.72, 0.60 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

5 4

[opensuse-factory] gcc47, Go language, gold linker
by Graham Anderson 22 Mar '12

22 Mar '12

Sascha, list, With Go language changes pretty much finished and a Go 1.0 stable release iminent I'd like to progress more with how we support this language. We already have a very good Go compiler in Factory but I would also like to have the gccgo compiler available for 12.2 so that we can offer a great Go hacking environment. Go currently has two reference implementations of it's spec, the first is the more commonly used {5,6,8}g compiler which is developed with the main Go tree, it's a derivative of Ken Thompson's plan 9 C compiler. The second reference implementation is the gccgo frontend introduced with gcc46 by Ian Taylor (who engineered the gold linker). The benefits of having both compilers are as follows: 5g, 6g, 8g compilers are *very* fast but gccgo compiler generates faster code also The language is new, having two reference compilers is great for sanity checks on Go code projects. Some developers may be more comfortable with a gcc frontend because they use the gcc collection anyway. Building the gccgo frontend is no problem, however to implement the same parity of concurrency features as the other compiler, gccgo needs to be built with the gold linker. Go concurrency is based on lightweight threads called goroutines, the goroutines are multiplexed on top of OS threads with each goroutine having their own small initial stack. This is managed by the Go runtime but the compiler and linker must support it. The version of the gold linker in factory (binutils 2.22) supports segmented stacks however gcc47 is currently built with traditional ld linker. Since now is the time where we are potentially adopting gcc47 it's also a good time to ask about what I would like to see from it. I can easily build gcc47 on my local OBS with my preference for the gold linker, but it's clear from the .spec.in comments of the gcc package that the compiler testing framework is an internal affair. I would therefore request that an analysis of building gcc with the gold linker was performed on the internal test framework for gcc. If it's impractical to ask for a change of linker at the same time as a change of gcc version, then by all means say so (note that I'm only asking that gcc be built with gold linker). In which case I can try and maintain a gccgo compiler inside the go language project. thoughts, advice and criticism very welcome. Cheers the noo, Graham -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

5 11

[opensuse-factory] Milestone 2 doesn't like extra /usr partition
by Robert Klein 22 Mar '12

22 Mar '12

Hi, I tried installing Milestone 2 (factory snapshot from 2012-03-16, to be exact) using an autoyast profile. When I tried to use an extra /usr partition, I got the error message below. Both files not found in the error message below are in /usr/lib64. The corresponding packages are libblkid1 and libkmod2. When I install to only one partition, the problem goes away. Best regards Robert ----><8------><8--- error message at first boot ---><8------><8---- Booting 'openSUSE, with Linux 3.3.0-rc6-1-desktop' Loading Linux 3.3.0-rc6-1-desktop ... Loading initial ramdisk ... doing fast boot Creating device nodes with udev udevd[198]: failed to execute '/etc/sysconfig/network/scripts/ifup-sysctl' '/etc /sysconfig/network/scripts/ifup-sysctl lo -o hotplug': No such file or directory resuming device not found (ignoring) Waiting for device /dev/root to appear: ok fsck from util-linux 2.2.1 [/sbin/fsck.ext3 (1) -- /] fsck.ext3 -a -C0 /dev/sda1 /dev/sda1: clean, 8434/262944 files, 114475/1050112 blocks fsck succeeded. Mounting root device read-write. Mounting root /dev/root mount -o rw,acl,usr_xattr -t ext3 /dev/root /root /sbin/fsck: error while loading shared libraries: libblkid.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory /sbin/init: error while loading shared libraries: libkmod.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory [ 5.531005] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! [ 5.5331059] panic occurred, switching back to text console -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 2

[opensuse-factory] i915 (Intel GM45) problem on Factory
by aledr 22 Mar '12

22 Mar '12

Good day! Is there anyone else with problems running i915 on Factory? Im facing sort of the faults: Backtrace: [ 213.517] 0: /usr/bin/Xorg (xorg_backtrace+0x26) [0x462386] [ 213.518] 1: /usr/bin/Xorg (0x400000+0x66b89) [0x466b89] [ 213.518] 2: /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x7f6e28dbd000+0xf270) [0x7f6e28dcc270] [ 213.518] 3: /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x7f6e27c4e000+0x126070) [0x7f6e27d74070] [ 213.518] 4: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/intel_drv.so (0x7f6e261f4000+0x353ee) [0x7f6e262293ee] [ 213.518] 5: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/intel_drv.so (0x7f6e261f4000+0x6a59f) [0x7f6e2625e59f] [ 213.518] 6: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/intel_drv.so (0x7f6e261f4000+0x59df3) [0x7f6e2624ddf3] [ 213.518] 7: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/intel_drv.so (0x7f6e261f4000+0x5e4a0) [0x7f6e262524a0] [ 213.518] 8: /usr/bin/Xorg (0x400000+0xdeb46) [0x4deb46] [ 213.518] 9: /usr/bin/Xorg (0x400000+0xaaa88) [0x4aaa88] [ 213.518] 10: /usr/bin/Xorg (0x400000+0x166f4d) [0x566f4d] [ 213.518] 11: /usr/bin/Xorg (BlockHandler+0x4a) [0x43704a] [ 213.518] 12: /usr/bin/Xorg (WaitForSomething+0x11d) [0x45fd8d] [ 213.518] 13: /usr/bin/Xorg (0x400000+0x33052) [0x433052] [ 213.518] 14: /usr/bin/Xorg (0x400000+0x272ee) [0x4272ee] [ 213.518] 15: /lib64/libc.so.6 (__libc_start_main+0xed) [0x7f6e27c6f3bd] [ 213.518] 16: /usr/bin/Xorg (0x400000+0x275dd) [0x4275dd] [ 213.518] Segmentation fault at address 0x308 [ 213.518] Fatal server error: [ 213.518] Caught signal 11 (Segmentation fault). Server aborting -- [ ]'s Aledr - Alexandre "OpenSource Solutions for SmallBusiness Problems" -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

7 11

[opensuse-factory] Nvidia driver requires a patch to compile (was: Milestone #2)
by Lars Müller 22 Mar '12

22 Mar '12

On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 12:57:27PM +0100, Christoph Obexer wrote: > the Nvidia driver needs a "patch" to compile: > > http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=2526815&postcount=6 > > "Then go to the kernel sub folder and open the conftest.sh search for > "CFLAGS=”$CFLAGS -I$SOURCES/arch/x86/include” and replace it with > CFLAGS=”$CFLAGS -I$SOURCES/arch/x86/include > -I$SOURCES/arch/x86/include/generated” > > HTH If nothing happens in the next week please file a bug report and assign it to Stefan <sndirsch at suse dor com> in bugzilla. It might be helpful if you use a dedicated thread from beginning and in particular a subject which allows an easier way to identify what the mail is about. Thanks, Lars -- Lars Müller [ˈlaː(r)z ˈmʏlɐ] Samba Team SUSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany

4 7

Re: [opensuse-factory] Tumbleweed 3.3.0-16.1 kernel does not allow install of nvidia driver
by Alin Marin Elena 22 Mar '12

22 Mar '12

you will need to patch the driver... the process was discussed on the factory-ml already. Alin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-factory] udev rules currently broken
by Cristian Rodríguez 22 Mar '12

22 Mar '12

Hi: Currently factory has broken udev rules.. /lib/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-storage.rules calls /sbin/blkid but that executable is no longer there.but under the the /usr hierarchy. This causes all sorts of errors at boot. Just a heads-up. Cristian. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

4 4