Repository Permission Handling
Hi, i would like to propose the following permission practices for the repository: Factory:Contrib * Repository is owned by reviewers * Submission of new packages happens trough osc submitreq and goes trough an initial review. * Repo bugowner is opensuse-contrib@opensuse.org * Packages are owned by maintainers * Development on packages just happens, no additional review. * Package bugowner is the maintainer <version>:Contrib * Repository is owned by reviewers * No new packages * Repo bugowner is opensuse-contrib@opensuse.org * Packages are owned by reviewers * Everything is handled by osc submitreq and goes trough an review * Package bugowner is the maintainer Can we agree on that? Henne -- http://opensuse.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@opensuse.org
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 12:14 AM, Henne Vogelsang
Hi,
i would like to propose the following permission practices for the repository:
Factory:Contrib * Repository is owned by reviewers * Submission of new packages happens trough osc submitreq and goes trough an initial review. * Repo bugowner is opensuse-contrib@opensuse.org * Packages are owned by maintainers * Development on packages just happens, no additional review. * Package bugowner is the maintainer
<version>:Contrib * Repository is owned by reviewers * No new packages * Repo bugowner is opensuse-contrib@opensuse.org * Packages are owned by reviewers * Everything is handled by osc submitreq and goes trough an review * Package bugowner is the maintainer
Can we agree on that?
Yes. In principle it is not much different from what we have already. Which is summarized here: http://en.opensuse.org/Contrib/Adding_new_packages Except one thing: As far as we are small - let's reduce bureaucracy and all different ways of submitting package-review requests - email list and osc, and perhaps later - bugzilla. -- -Alexey Eromenko "Technologov" -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@opensuse.org
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 23:14 +0100, Henne Vogelsang wrote:
Hi,
i would like to propose the following permission practices for the repository:
Factory:Contrib * Repository is owned by reviewers * Submission of new packages happens trough osc submitreq and goes trough an initial review. * Repo bugowner is opensuse-contrib@opensuse.org * Packages are owned by maintainers * Development on packages just happens, no additional review. * Package bugowner is the maintainer
<version>:Contrib * Repository is owned by reviewers * No new packages * Repo bugowner is opensuse-contrib@opensuse.org * Packages are owned by reviewers * Everything is handled by osc submitreq and goes trough an review * Package bugowner is the maintainer
Can we agree on that?
Sounds good... +1 Cheers, Magnus -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@opensuse.org
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Magnus Boman
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 23:14 +0100, Henne Vogelsang wrote:
Hi,
i would like to propose the following permission practices for the repository:
Factory:Contrib * Repository is owned by reviewers * Submission of new packages happens trough osc submitreq and goes trough an initial review. * Repo bugowner is opensuse-contrib@opensuse.org * Packages are owned by maintainers * Development on packages just happens, no additional review. * Package bugowner is the maintainer
<version>:Contrib * Repository is owned by reviewers * No new packages * Repo bugowner is opensuse-contrib@opensuse.org * Packages are owned by reviewers * Everything is handled by osc submitreq and goes trough an review * Package bugowner is the maintainer
Can we agree on that?
Sounds good... +1
+1 I've already tried to ask on ml and bugzilla. Right now I have an OBS Request open since 12/01, It seems to be not so quickly. Maybe osc is the best choice. -- [ ]'s Aledr - Alexandre "OpenSource Solutions for SmallBusiness Problems" -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@opensuse.org
Le lundi 08 décembre 2008, à 23:14 +0100, Henne Vogelsang a écrit :
Hi,
i would like to propose the following permission practices for the repository:
Factory:Contrib * Repository is owned by reviewers * Submission of new packages happens trough osc submitreq and goes trough an initial review. * Repo bugowner is opensuse-contrib@opensuse.org * Packages are owned by maintainers * Development on packages just happens, no additional review. * Package bugowner is the maintainer
<version>:Contrib * Repository is owned by reviewers * No new packages * Repo bugowner is opensuse-contrib@opensuse.org * Packages are owned by reviewers * Everything is handled by osc submitreq and goes trough an review * Package bugowner is the maintainer
Can we agree on that?
Definitely makes sense. This won't be an issue now, so there's no need to find a solution now, but I think it makes sense to have something like Debian NMU (non-maintainer upload) for Factory:Contrib if a maintainer isn't responsive for some time. Just something to keep in mind for when the issue will arise. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@opensuse.org
Hello, Am Montag, 8. Dezember 2008 schrieb Henne Vogelsang:
i would like to propose the following permission practices for the repository: ... <version>:Contrib * Repository is owned by reviewers * No new packages
I basically agree on your proposal except the "no new packages" rule for <version>:Contrib. IMHO it should be allowed (after a package went through the usual review process, of course). Why do you think we shouldn't allow new packages for released openSUSE versions in Contrib? (Maybe I overlooked some possible problem?) Regards, Christian Boltz --
...was dann wieder in polnisch, tschechisch und auf'm Mars versagt. :-) Die Sprachen habe ich noch nie benötigt. Und auf dem Mars gibts ne eigene Distri (für 21-Saugnapf-Tastaturen). [> Ratti und Jan Trippler in suse-linux] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@opensuse.org
Hi, Christian Boltz wrote:
Am Montag, 8. Dezember 2008 schrieb Henne Vogelsang:
i would like to propose the following permission practices for the repository: ... <version>:Contrib * Repository is owned by reviewers * No new packages
I basically agree on your proposal except the "no new packages" rule for <version>:Contrib. IMHO it should be allowed (after a package went through the usual review process, of course).
Why do you think we shouldn't allow new packages for released openSUSE versions in Contrib? (Maybe I overlooked some possible problem?)
Because a changing repo can possible introduce new bugs you did not catch during the beta phase of contrib (which would be in parallel to factory betas). Of course you can do that but its definitely a risk. Henne -- Henne Vogelsang, openSUSE. Everybody has a plan, until they get hit. - Mike Tyson -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@opensuse.org
participants (6)
-
aledr -
Alexey Eremenko -
Christian Boltz -
Henne Vogelsang -
Magnus Boman -
Vincent Untz