On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 09:13:23PM +0200, Adrian Schröter wrote:
Am Montag, 23. April 2012, 16:02:25 schrieb Claudio Freire:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Greg Freemyer
wrote: People tend to branch it instead of adding an _aggregate so a change in the original package triggers lots of other packages.
Regards.
It's down to 23 builds 4 hours later, so at least they are not in an infinite loop.
If trying to recover some OBS resources, llvm seems like a package worth trying kill off some branches / build repos.
I think the problem is that the wiki recommends not to use aggregates, which seems counterintuitive.
aggregates are indeed only recommended for very extreme cases. And you need know exactly the disadvantages of it.
Many timas an aggregate is better than a source link, though. Source links/branches are even worse than aggregates. But most of the time the correct solution is to just put the repository with the needed packages in the path. You need aggregates/source links only if - the other packages from the repository break your build, or - you need to have the packages in your published repo. Cheers, Michael. -- Michael Schroeder mls@suse.de SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF Jeff Hawn, HRB 16746 AG Nuernberg main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);} -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org