January 2024 - openSUSE Build Service - openSUSE Mailing Lists

How to change my e-mail address for build.o.o
by Martin Winter 08 Apr '24

08 Apr '24

There are several threads asking this very same question. The latest I found was this one: https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/buildservice@lists.opensuse.org/th…. However I still do not find an answer to that question. What I tried: - Going to my profile on build.o.o and edit my profile: The e-mail address is not editable. - Change the user meta via `osc meta user -e letsfindaway`: Does not change anything. - Login to Micro Focus and try to edit my profile there: The e-mail address is not editable. So what is the way to change the e-mail address listed on my profile in build.o.o and used to send e-mail notifications? Thanks for any insights and pointers! Martin

8 15

build.opensuse.org wrong sender email address
by Stefan Seyfried 28 Feb '24

28 Feb '24

Hi all, build.opensuse.org sends mail from noreply(a)opensuse.org This is an invalid address: ~> telnet mx2.opensuse.org 25 Trying 195.135.221.158... Connected to mx2.opensuse.org. Escape character is '^]'. 220 mx2.opensuse.org ESMTP Postfix (3.7.2) helo seife 250 mx2.opensuse.org mail from: seife(a)opensuse.org 250 2.1.0 Ok rcpt to: noreply(a)opensuse.org 550 5.7.1 <noreply(a)opensuse.org>: Recipient address rejected: This Email address is not monitored. Please contact admin(a)opensuse.org in case you need personal assistance. quit 221 2.0.0 Bye Connection closed by foreign host. ~> My mail provider only allows verified addresses (postfix option "reject_unverified_sender") so it would be useful to change this maybe to admin(a)opensuse.org? Best regards, -- Stefan Seyfried "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled." -- Richard Feynman

2 1

Building Tumbleweed based ISO image:
by opensuse.lietuviu.kalba 12 Feb '24

12 Feb '24

Hi, I try to create ISO image based on openSUSE Tumbleweed in openSUSE Build Service. But I get error: EXEC: [chroot /usr/src/packages/KIWI-iso/build/image-root dracut --verbose --no-hostonly --no-hostonly-cmdline --install /.profile --add kiwi-live pollcdrom --omit multipath Lietukas_T_mini.x86_64-2021.initrd 6.7.1-2-default] EXEC: Failed with stderr: (no output on stderr), stdout: /usr/bin/dracut: line 1070: /sys/module/firmware_class/parameters/path: No such file or directory [ 351s] dracut[F]: Cannot find module directory /lib/modules/6.7.1-2-default/ [ 351s] dracut[F]: and --no-kernel was not specified See full log here: - https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:embar-:Lietukas/Liet… - https://paste.opensuse.org/pastes/a8072f79bbc4 (copy of today build log) See image configuration here: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:embar-:Lietukas/Lietukas_T_mini Can you please help to figure out how to fix error? -- Regards, Mindaugas

3 7

OBS rpmlint check inside tar.gz file include binary or not?
by Obs Geeko 29 Jan '24

29 Jan '24

Hello, May I ask if "rpmlint" or "rpmlint-strict" check inside the tar.gz file or other compressed file, if it includes binary file inside? Are there some ways to achieve it? Thank you.

1 0

Cannot build package for AlmaLinux 9 due to "public key not available"
by Olsson, Dennis 25 Jan '24

25 Jan '24

Hi, I am trying to do a local build of a package (home:DOlsson:fvwm2) for AlmaLinux9 (using my own "AlmaLinux9" repository, which is a simple pointer to "AlmaLinux:9/standard"), but the build refuses to build, because non of the packages needed for the build can be installed due to "no public key available": $ osc build --local-package --clean Building fvwm2.spec for AlmaLinux9/x86_64 Getting buildconfig from server and store to /import/olympix-alt/data/home/olsde000/devel/ATS/aman-rel3.3/misc/sources/OBS/home:DOlsson/fvwm2/.osc/_buildconfig-AlmaLinux9-x86_64 Getting buildinfo from server and store to /import/olympix-alt/data/home/olsde000/devel/ATS/aman-rel3.3/misc/sources/OBS/home:DOlsson/fvwm2/.osc/_buildinfo-AlmaLinux9-x86_64.xml Updating cache of required packages 0.0% cache miss. 545/545 dependencies cached. Verifying integrity of cached packages using keys from AlmaLinux:9 warning: /var/tmp/osbuild-packagecache/AlmaLinux:9/baseos/x86_64/almalinux-release-9.3-1.el9.x86_64.rpm: Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID b86b3716: NOKEY /var/tmp/osbuild-packagecache/AlmaLinux:9/baseos/x86_64/almalinux-release-9.3-1.el9.x86_64.rpm : public key not available /var/tmp/osbuild-packagecache/AlmaLinux:9/baseos/x86_64/alternatives-1.24-1.el9.x86_64.rpm : public key not available ...<tons of more lines>... $ Any idea as to why this happens, and especially how to fix it? Many thanks in advance/DO Dennis Olsson | External employee on behalf of DFS | TS/PC DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH * Am DFS-Campus * 63225 Langen * Tel.: +49 6103 707-0 * Sitz der Gesellschaft: Langen/Hessen * Zuständiges Registergericht: AG Offenbach am Main, HRB 34977 * Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Antje Geese * Geschäftsführung: Arndt Schoenemann (Vors.), Dirk Mahns, Friedrich-Wilhelm Menge, Andrea Wächter * www.dfs.de<http://www.dfs.de> Sollten Sie nicht der richtige Empfänger dieser E-Mail sein, löschen Sie diese bitte.

1 0

New Blog Post about Revamping the Request Build Status Page and Introducing the Dark Mode
by Eduardo Navarro 25 Jan '24

25 Jan '24

Hello everybody, The Build Solutions team is glad to be back to you in a new year with a blog post full of interesting updates, most of them improving our Request page. You can find more details in our latest blog post: https://openbuildservice.org/2024/01/25/revamping-the-build-status-page-and… Kind regards, The Build Solutions Team

1 0

Building for Leap 16
by Andreas Vetter 25 Jan '24

25 Jan '24

Hi, what is the correct path for Leap 16.0? I used <path project="security:Stunnel" repository="openSUSE_Leap_16.0"/> <arch>x86_64</arch> This gave a unresolvable libopenssl-devel, because libopenssl and libopenssl- devel were at different versions: 3.1 vs 3.2. Is that to be expected? This problem is gone now, but maybe I have to use a different path. -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen, Andreas Vetter

2 1

FC39 obs-build dependency perl-LWP-Protocol-https
by Stefan van der Eijk 24 Jan '24

24 Jan '24

Hi, The obs-build package fails to upgrade due to a dependency issue. Dnf output: Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package obs-build-20240111-439.1.noarch - nothing provides perl(LWP-Protocol-https) needed by obs-build-20240111-441.1.noarch from openSUSE_Tools ================================================================================ Package Architecture Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Skipping packages with broken dependencies: obs-build noarch 20240111-441.1 openSUSE_Tools 359 k perl-LWP-Protocol-https package is installed, and provides: ❯ rpm -q --provides perl-LWP-Protocol-https-6.11-1.fc39.noarch perl(LWP::Protocol::https) = 6.11 perl(LWP::Protocol::https::Socket) perl-LWP-Protocol-https = 6.11-1.fc39 Dependency in obs-build package should be changed from "perl(LWP-Protocol-https)" to "perl(LWP::Protocol::https)"? kind regards, Stefan

2 2

Raspbian 12 distribution
by John Serock 19 Jan '24

19 Jan '24

Raspbian 12 was released (https://archive.raspbian.org/raspbian/dists/bookworm/). Would someone please add a Raspbian 12 distribution to OBS? Thank you.

3 11

OBS architecture local
by Obs Geeko 18 Jan '24

18 Jan '24

Hello, May I ask what "local" architecture is used for in OBS? I found it in "https://build.opensuse.org/repositories/openSUSE:Factory" and other factory repositories. Thank you. Best regards

2 1