https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396165 Peter Varkoly changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396165 User markgray+to-suse@puck.nac.net added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396165#c2 Mark Gray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | --- Comment #2 from Mark Gray 2008-06-03 10:13:16 MDT --- I disagree -- the ClientID is used by most DSL routers to assign a stable IP address to the different ethernet cards requesting addresses. This IP address is used to configure the virtual server function in the router (as well as other functions in a LAN). The new DUID used by default instead of using the MAC address by default causes the routers to assign different IP addresses to 11.0 than are assigned for all previous openSUSE releases (as well as Win-XP, ubuntu 8.04 and Fedora Core 9.0). There should at the very least be a method to allow easier configuration to use the old default of using the MAC address. (dhclient on 11.0 still uses the MAC address and gets the same IP address for the card as all the other OS releases). Setting the DHCLIENT_CLIENT_ID manually using a text editor is good enough for me, but I believe you should be aware that the DUID feature is going to cause surprises for many of your other users, so you should at the very least warn them in the release notes. (I have noticed two or three bugs involving dhcpcd which could be caused by this problem BTW). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396165 User varkoly@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396165#c4 --- Comment #4 from Peter Varkoly 2008-06-04 01:05:18 MDT --- OK I can see it is a realy problem. I'll discuss this with PM if we can fix it because we are at RC1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396165 Peter Varkoly changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Info Provider|aj@novell.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396165 User markgray+to-suse@puck.nac.net added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396165#c7 --- Comment #7 from Mark Gray 2008-06-04 12:42:02 MDT --- Okay -- it still does not work. I suspect it is because the ClientID (aka DUID) needs to be prefixed with a "01:" Here is the dhcpcd log: Jun 4 14:23:18 ze dhcpcd[7372]: eth0: dhcpcd 3.2.3 starting Jun 4 14:23:18 ze dhcpcd[7372]: eth0: hardware address = 00:0d:9d:5e:33:93 Jun 4 14:23:18 ze dhcpcd[7372]: eth0: DUID = 00:0d:9d:5e:33:93 Jun 4 14:23:18 ze ifup-dhcp: . Jun 4 14:23:18 ze dhcpcd[7372]: eth0: broadcasting for a lease Jun 4 14:23:18 ze dhcpcd[7372]: eth0: offered 10.0.0.3 from 10.0.0.2 Jun 4 14:23:18 ze dhcpcd[7372]: eth0: checking 10.0.0.3 is available on attached networks Jun 4 14:23:19 ze ifup-dhcp: . Jun 4 14:23:19 ze dhcpcd[7372]: eth0: leased 10.0.0.3 for 86400 seconds Jun 4 14:23:19 ze dhcpcd[7372]: eth0: no renewal time supplied, assuming 43200 seconds Jun 4 14:23:19 ze dhcpcd[7372]: eth0: no rebind time supplied, assuming 75600 seconds Jun 4 14:23:19 ze dhcpcd[7372]: eth0: adding IP address 10.0.0.3/8 Jun 4 14:23:19 ze dhcpcd[7372]: eth0: adding default route via 10.0.0.2 metric 0 Jun 4 14:23:19 ze dhcpcd[7372]: eth0: adding route to 169.254.0.0/16 metric 0 Jun 4 14:23:20 ze dhcpcd[7372]: eth0: exiting Jun 4 14:23:20 ze ifup-dhcp: IP/Netmask: '10.0.0.3' Jun 4 14:23:20 ze ifup-dhcp: / '255.0.0.0' Jun 4 14:23:20 ze ifup-dhcp: <end quote> In other words the line with: Jun 4 14:23:18 ze dhcpcd[7372]: eth0: DUID = 00:0d:9d:5e:33:93 should be: Jun 4 14:23:18 ze dhcpcd[7372]: eth0: DUID = 01:00:0d:9d:5e:33:93 but this is just a guess. BTW, you did not make up an x86_64 binary which I would like to test as well. Thank you for your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396165 User varkoly@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396165#c9 Peter Varkoly changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |RESOLVED Info Provider|markgray+to-suse@puck.nac.net | Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #9 from Peter Varkoly 2008-06-05 08:14:58 MDT --- fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396165 User varkoly@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396165#c11 --- Comment #11 from Peter Varkoly 2008-06-06 08:58:01 MDT --- Actually it would have to go substantially faster. I do not know what happened. Please try it later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.