http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910#c5
--- Comment #5 from Jean Delvare 2010-06-14 11:48:56 UTC ---
in0, in1 and in2 are clearly Vcore, Vdram and +3.3V, respectively, with no
scaling needed. The Vcore difference with what the BIOS and EasyTune show can
be explained by the fact that Linux scales down the CPU frequency and voltage
(CPUFreq).
+12V could be either in3 or in4, but I'd rather be in favor of in4, firstly
because it matches ITE's recommendations (which I have received meanwhile),
secondly because your +12V value is relatively high. Gigabyte apparently didn't
use the standard scaling factor (4.00), but I'm used to that by now.
in3 would thus be +5V, even if it doesn't show in your BIOS nor in EasyTune.
Did you check in the kernel logs when the it87 driver gets loaded? It may
confirm this theory.
in6 is obviously unused, so we can ignore it. As for the other voltages (in5
and in7), I am clueless. They don't match any of the entries you have in
"System Voltage Control". And standard negative voltage (-5V, -12V)
computations don't match either. We can leave them without a label. According
to the datasheet, in7 is internal, but they don't say what it is monitoring, so
it's not that helpful.
Lastly, cpu0_vid is wrong. Could be an it87 or hwmon-vid driver bug, but more
likely the VID pins are simply not wired on your system.
I will attach a preliminary configuration file for your board soon.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.