https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357598
User trenn@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357598#c50
Thomas Renninger changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |Robert.Moore@intel.com
--- Comment #50 from Thomas Renninger 2008-02-07 09:47:37 MST ---
Can someone (one is enough :) ) please attach acpidump output.
Just call:
acpidump >/tmp/acpidump
and upload the /tmp/acpidump file.
Intel's ACPICA developers want to have a closer look at this as the patch is
already in their mainline code (and will pop up in the next mainline kernel
then).
Please be sure that cpufreq is now fixed with the new kernel (e.g. Christoph
still has no cpufreq (and never had?)).
Alexander, maybe we could use your acpidump as reference to fix this upstream
(simply deleting the patch is affecting other (probably very specific) systems
and is also not a solution).
The error messages related to the sizeOf patch you saw in dmesg were these,
correct?:
ACPI Error (dsopcode-0250): No pointer back to NS node in buffer obj
ffff81007cc35160 [20070126]
ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_PR_.CPU0._PDC]
(Node ffff810037fc5690), AE_AML_INTERNAL
ACPI: Processor [CPU0] (supports 8 throttling states)
ACPI Error (dsopcode-0250): No pointer back to NS node in buffer obj
ffff810037f8fce0 [20070126]
ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_PR_.CPU1._PDC]
(Node ffff810037fc5610), AE_AML_INTERNAL
ACPI: Processor [CPU1] (supports 8 throttling states)
and are now gone after the sizeOf patch has been ripped out of our 2.6.22 10.3
kernel, right?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.