http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=987668
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=987668#c11
--- Comment #11 from Eric Bischoff
IMHO, that's just the wrong thing to do...
Well, they decide to use their own implementation of sd_notify() so you're basically on your own now, sorry. And it will surely break later when systemd will decide to change any bits of the implementation of the sd_notify() protocol.
(And of course sd_notify() is supported by systemd v210).
I can understand why they did it: to remove dependency to systemd libraries. With respect to future changes, in the patch comments they say "this is a stable ABI from systemd's POV which explicitly allows independent implementations". It resolves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314881. So it's not a gratuitous change just for the pleasure of reimplementing things :-) . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.