= num_extents, file: fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c, line: 5526
[125471.338844] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[125471.340745] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:4173!
[125471.340745] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
[125471.340745] Modules linked in: btrfs f2fs xfs libcrc32c dm_flakey dm_mod
crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd
grace fscache sunrpc loop fuse parport_pc acpi_cpufreq psmouse i2c_piix4
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025062
Bug ID: 1025062
Summary: Btrfs: fix extent accounting for partial direct IO
writes
Classification: openSUSE
Product: openSUSE Distribution
Version: Leap 42.1
Hardware: Other
OS: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: Normal
Priority: P5 - None
Component: Kernel
Assignee: jeffm@suse.com
Reporter: jeffm@suse.com
QA Contact: qa-bugs@suse.de
Found By: ---
Blocker: ---
From: Filipe Manana
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 09:52:04 +0000
Subject: Btrfs: fix extent accounting for partial direct IO writes
Git-commit: 9c9464cc92668984ebed79e22b5063877a8d97db
Patch-mainline: v4.4-rc1
References: revisit
When doing a write using direct IO we can end up not doing the whole write
operation using the direct IO path, in that case we fallback to a buffered
write to do the remaining IO. This happens for example if the range we are
writing to contains a compressed extent.
When we do a partial write and fallback to buffered IO, due to the
existence of a compressed extent for example, we end up not adjusting the
outstanding extents counter of our inode which ends up getting decremented
twice, once by the DIO ordered extent for the partial write and once again
by btrfs_direct_IO(), resulting in an arithmetic underflow at
extent-tree.c:drop_outstanding_extent(). For example if we have:
extents [ prealloc extent ] [ compressed extent ]
offsets A B C D E
and at the moment our inode's outstanding extents counter is 0, if we do a
direct IO write against the range [B, D[ (which has a length smaller than
128Mb), we end up bumping our inode's outstanding extents counter to 1, we
create a DIO ordered extent for the range [B, C[ and then fallback to a
buffered write for the range [C, D[. The direct IO handler
(inode.c:btrfs_direct_IO()) decrements the outstanding extents counter by
1, leaving it with a value of 0, through a call to
btrfs_delalloc_release_space() and then shortly after the DIO ordered
extent finishes and calls btrfs_delalloc_release_metadata() which ends
up to attempt to decrement the inode's outstanding extents counter by 1,
resulting in an assertion failure at drop_outstanding_extent() because
the operation would result in an arithmetic underflow (0 - 1). This
produces the following trace:
[125471.336838] BTRFS: assertion failed: BTRFS_I(inode)->outstanding_extents
parport pcspkr serio_raw microcode processor evdev i2c_core button ext4 crc16
jbd2 mbcache sd_mod sg sr_mod cdrom ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix virtio_pci
virtio_ring floppy libata virtio e1000 scsi_mod [last unloaded: btrfs]
[125471.340745] CPU: 10 PID: 23649 Comm: kworker/u32:1 Tainted: G W
4.3.0-rc5-btrfs-next-17+ #1
[125471.340745] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
rel-1.8.1-0-g4adadbd-20150316_085822-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014
[125471.340745] Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_endio_write_helper [btrfs]
[125471.340745] task: ffff8804244fcf80 ti: ffff88040a118000 task.ti:
ffff88040a118000
[125471.340745] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa0550da1>] [<ffffffffa0550da1>]
assfail.constprop.46+0x1e/0x20 [btrfs]
[125471.340745] RSP: 0018:ffff88040a11bc78 EFLAGS: 00010296
[125471.340745] RAX: 0000000000000075 RBX: 0000000000005000 RCX:
0000000000000000
[125471.340745] RDX: ffffffff81098f93 RSI: ffffffff8147c619 RDI:
00000000ffffffff
[125471.340745] RBP: ffff88040a11bc78 R08: 0000000000000001 R09:
0000000000000000
[125471.340745] R10: ffff88040a11bc08 R11: ffffffff81651000 R12:
ffff8803efb4a000
[125471.340745] R13: ffff8803efb4a000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15:
ffff8802f8e33c88
[125471.340745] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88043dd40000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[125471.340745] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
[125471.340745] CR2: 00007fae7ca86095 CR3: 0000000001a0b000 CR4:
00000000000006e0
[125471.340745] Stack:
[125471.340745] ffff88040a11bc88 ffffffffa04ca0cd ffff88040a11bcc8
ffffffffa04ceeb1
[125471.340745] ffff8802f8e33940 ffff8802c93eadb0 ffff8802f8e0bf50
ffff8803efb4a000
[125471.340745] 0000000000000000 ffff8802f8e33c88 ffff88040a11bd38
ffffffffa04eccfa
[125471.340745] Call Trace:
[125471.340745] [<ffffffffa04ca0cd>] drop_outstanding_extent+0x3d/0x6d
[btrfs]
[125471.340745] [<ffffffffa04ceeb1>]
btrfs_delalloc_release_metadata+0x51/0xdd [btrfs]
[125471.340745] [<ffffffffa04eccfa>] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x420/0x4eb
[btrfs]
[125471.340745] [<ffffffffa04ecdda>] finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x17 [btrfs]
[125471.340745] [<ffffffffa050e6e8>] normal_work_helper+0x14c/0x32a [btrfs]
[125471.340745] [<ffffffffa050e9c8>] btrfs_endio_write_helper+0x12/0x14
[btrfs]
[125471.340745] [<ffffffff81063b23>] process_one_work+0x24a/0x4ac
[125471.340745] [<ffffffff81064285>] worker_thread+0x206/0x2c2
[125471.340745] [<ffffffff8106407f>] ? rescuer_thread+0x2cb/0x2cb
[125471.340745] [<ffffffff8106407f>] ? rescuer_thread+0x2cb/0x2cb
[125471.340745] [<ffffffff8106904d>] kthread+0xef/0xf7
[125471.340745] [<ffffffff81068f5e>] ? kthread_parkme+0x24/0x24
[125471.340745] [<ffffffff8147d10f>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
[125471.340745] [<ffffffff81068f5e>] ? kthread_parkme+0x24/0x24
[125471.340745] Code: a5 55 a0 48 89 e5 e8 42 50 bc e0 0f 0b 55 89 f1 48 c7
c2 f0 a8 55 a0 48 89 fe 31 c0 48 c7 c7 14 aa 55 a0 48 89 e5 e8 22 50 bc e0 <0f>
0b 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 31 c9 ba 18 00 00 00 48 89 e5 41 56 41
[125471.340745] RIP [<ffffffffa0550da1>] assfail.constprop.46+0x1e/0x20
[btrfs]
[125471.340745] RSP <ffff88040a11bc78>
[125471.539620] ---[ end trace 144259f7838b4aa4 ]---
So fix this by ensuring we adjust the outstanding extents counter when we
do the fallback just like we do for the case where the whole write can be
done through the direct IO path.
We were also adjusting the outstanding extents counter by a constant value
of 1, which is incorrect because we were ignorning that we account extents
in BTRFS_MAX_EXTENT_SIZE units, o fix that as well.
The following test case for fstests reproduces this issue:
seq=`basename $0`
seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
echo "QA output created by $seq"
tmp=/tmp/$$
status=1 # failure is the default!
trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
_cleanup()
{
rm -f $tmp.*
}
# get standard environment, filters and checks
. ./common/rc
. ./common/filter
# real QA test starts here
_need_to_be_root
_supported_fs btrfs
_supported_os Linux
_require_scratch
_require_xfs_io_command "falloc"
rm -f $seqres.full
_scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
_scratch_mount "-o compress"
# Create a compressed extent covering the range [700K, 800K[.
$XFS_IO_PROG -f -s -c "pwrite -S 0xaa -b 100K 700K 100K" \
$SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io
# Create prealloc extent covering the range [600K, 700K[.
$XFS_IO_PROG -c "falloc 600K 100K" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
# Write 80K of data to the range [640K, 720K[ using direct IO. This
# range covers both the prealloc extent and the compressed extent.
# Because there's a compressed extent in the range we are writing to,
# the DIO write code path ends up only writing the first 60k of data,
# which goes to the prealloc extent, and then falls back to buffered IO
# for writing the remaining 20K of data - because that remaining data
# maps to a file range containing a compressed extent.
# When falling back to buffered IO, we used to trigger an assertion when
# releasing reserved space due to bad accounting of the inode's
# outstanding extents counter, which was set to 1 but we ended up
# decrementing it by 1 twice, once through the ordered extent for the
# 60K of data we wrote using direct IO, and once through the main direct
# IO handler (inode.cbtrfs_direct_IO()) because the direct IO write
# wrote less than 80K of data (60K).
$XFS_IO_PROG -d -c "pwrite -S 0xbb -b 80K 640K 80K" \
$SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io
# Now similar test as above but for very large write operations. This
# triggers special cases for an inode's outstanding extents accounting,
# as internally btrfs logically splits extents into 128Mb units.
$XFS_IO_PROG -f -s \
-c "pwrite -S 0xaa -b 128M 258M 128M" \
-c "falloc 0 258M" \
$SCRATCH_MNT/bar | _filter_xfs_io
$XFS_IO_PROG -d -c "pwrite -S 0xbb -b 256M 3M 256M" $SCRATCH_MNT/bar \
| _filter_xfs_io
# Now verify the file contents are correct and that they are the same
# even after unmounting and mounting the fs again (or evicting the page
# cache).
#
# For file foo, all bytes in the range [0, 640K[ must have a value of
# 0x00, all bytes in the range [640K, 720K[ must have a value of 0xbb
# and all bytes in the range [720K, 800K[ must have a value of 0xaa.
#
# For file bar, all bytes in the range [0, 3M[ must havea value of 0x00,
# all bytes in the range [3M, 259M[ must have a value of 0xbb and all
# bytes in the range [259M, 386M[ must have a value of 0xaa.
#
echo "File digests before remounting the file system:"
md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_scratch
md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/bar | _filter_scratch
_scratch_remount
echo "File digests after remounting the file system:"
md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_scratch
md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/bar | _filter_scratch
status=0
exit
Fixes: e1cbbfa5f5aa ("Btrfs: fix outstanding_extents accounting in DIO")
Fixes: 3e05bde8c3c2 ("Btrfs: only adjust outstanding_extents when we do a short
write")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana
Acked-by: Jeff Mahoney
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
