On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 04:03:05PM +0100, Arvin Schnell wrote:
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 11:09:06PM +0100, Arvin Schnell wrote:
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 07:42:47PM +0100, Ancor Gonzalez Sosa wrote:
I tried the instructions for building a rpm instead (from the README), but it failed when checking the python bindings. I tried a couple of workarounds (like adding -modern to the swig call) and ended up commenting the %check section in the specfile in order to proceed.
Indeed, with Factory something is broken. A few weeks ago it was still working. Try the swig version from the redesign project.
The Python bindings work with swig 3.0.7 but not with swig 3.0.8.
Luckily others have found the same problem (http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.programming.swig.devel/23745) and the workaround also works. So a clean solution should be possible.
Actually the issue should be fixed meanwhile in swig, see https://github.com/swig/swig/issues/583. I have updated swig to 3.0.7 in https://build.opensuse.org/project/monitor/home:aschnell:storage-redesign and enabled it for openSUSE:Factory. So in short: Don't use swig 3.0.8. ciao Arvin -- Arvin Schnell, <aschnell@suse.com> Senior Software Engineer, Research & Development SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstraße 5 90409 Nürnberg Germany -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yast-devel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: yast-devel+owner@opensuse.org