See http://ci.opensuse.org/job/yast-storage-ng-master/156/display/redirect?page=...
Changes:
[shundhammer] Prepend default subvol name to subvol path if there is a default subvol
[shundhammer] Don't shadow other volumes with a subvolume
[shundhammer] Propose subvolumes also in the LVM case
[shundhammer] Unit tests for fallback subvolumes
[shundhammer] More unit tests
[shundhammer] Added missing text
[shundhammer] Force Travis rebuild
------------------------------------------
[...truncated 416.17 KB...]
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/partition_creator.rb:57:in `each'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/partition_creator.rb:57:in `create_partitions'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/devicegraph_generator.rb:202:in `create_partitions'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/devicegraph_generator.rb:79:in `devicegraph'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal.rb:106:in `devicegraph'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal.rb:153:in `block in proposed_root_device'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal.rb:148:in `each'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal.rb:148:in `proposed_root_device'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal.rb:130:in `populated_settings'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal.rb:84:in `propose'
[ 62s] # ./test/support/proposal_examples.rb:29:in `block (2 levels) in '
[ 62s]
[ 62s] 93) Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PC with an empty GPT partition table not using LVM but using encryption with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] Failure/Error: mount_point.start_with?(other + "/")
[ 62s]
[ 62s] NoMethodError:
[ 62s] undefined method `+' for nil:NilClass
[ 62s] Shared Example Group: "proposed layout" called from ./test/support/proposal_examples.rb:91
[ 62s] Shared Example Group: "Encrypted partition-based proposed layouts" called from ./test/support/proposal_examples.rb:105
[ 62s] Shared Example Group: "all proposed layouts" called from ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb:131
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/planned_volume.rb:251:in `block in shadows?'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/planned_volume.rb:250:in `any?'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/planned_volume.rb:250:in `shadows?'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/planned_volume.rb:203:in `block in create_subvolumes'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/planned_volume.rb:200:in `each'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/planned_volume.rb:200:in `create_subvolumes'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/partition_creator.rb:129:in `block in create_volumes_partitions'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/partition_creator.rb:117:in `each_with_index'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/partition_creator.rb:117:in `create_volumes_partitions'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/partition_creator.rb:89:in `process_free_space'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/partition_creator.rb:58:in `block in create_partitions'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/partition_creator.rb:57:in `each'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/partition_creator.rb:57:in `create_partitions'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/devicegraph_generator.rb:202:in `create_partitions'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/devicegraph_generator.rb:79:in `devicegraph'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal.rb:106:in `devicegraph'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal.rb:153:in `block in proposed_root_device'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal.rb:148:in `each'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal.rb:148:in `proposed_root_device'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal.rb:130:in `populated_settings'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal.rb:84:in `propose'
[ 62s] # ./test/support/proposal_examples.rb:29:in `block (2 levels) in '
[ 62s]
[ 62s] 94) Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PC with an empty GPT partition table not using LVM but using encryption without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] Failure/Error: mount_point.start_with?(other + "/")
[ 62s]
[ 62s] NoMethodError:
[ 62s] undefined method `+' for nil:NilClass
[ 62s] Shared Example Group: "proposed layout" called from ./test/support/proposal_examples.rb:96
[ 62s] Shared Example Group: "Encrypted partition-based proposed layouts" called from ./test/support/proposal_examples.rb:105
[ 62s] Shared Example Group: "all proposed layouts" called from ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb:131
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/planned_volume.rb:251:in `block in shadows?'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/planned_volume.rb:250:in `any?'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/planned_volume.rb:250:in `shadows?'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/planned_volume.rb:203:in `block in create_subvolumes'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/planned_volume.rb:200:in `each'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/planned_volume.rb:200:in `create_subvolumes'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/partition_creator.rb:129:in `block in create_volumes_partitions'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/partition_creator.rb:117:in `each_with_index'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/partition_creator.rb:117:in `create_volumes_partitions'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/partition_creator.rb:89:in `process_free_space'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/partition_creator.rb:58:in `block in create_partitions'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/partition_creator.rb:57:in `each'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/partition_creator.rb:57:in `create_partitions'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/devicegraph_generator.rb:202:in `create_partitions'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/devicegraph_generator.rb:79:in `devicegraph'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal.rb:106:in `devicegraph'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal.rb:153:in `block in proposed_root_device'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal.rb:148:in `each'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal.rb:148:in `proposed_root_device'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal.rb:130:in `populated_settings'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal.rb:84:in `propose'
[ 62s] # ./test/support/proposal_examples.rb:29:in `block (2 levels) in '
[ 62s]
[ 62s] 95) Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PPC64 bare metal (PowerNV) if requires a /boot partition proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] Failure/Error: DEFAULT_FAILURE_NOTIFIER = lambda { |failure, _opts| raise failure }
[ 62s]
[ 62s] expected: "[[[\"disk\", [[\"align_ofs\", \"0 B\"], [\"block_size\", \"0.5 KiB\"], [\"io_size\", \"0 B\"], [\"mi..., [\"lvm_pvs\", [[[\"lvm_pv\", [[\"blk_device\", \"/dev/sda2\"]]]]]], [\"vg_name\", \"system\"]]]]]"
[ 62s] got: "[[[\"disk\", [[\"align_ofs\", \"0 B\"], [\"block_size\", \"0.5 KiB\"], [\"io_size\", \"0 B\"], [\"mi..., [\"lvm_pvs\", [[[\"lvm_pv\", [[\"blk_device\", \"/dev/sda2\"]]]]]], [\"vg_name\", \"system\"]]]]]"
[ 62s]
[ 62s] (compared using ==)
[ 62s] Shared Example Group: "proposed layout" called from ./test/proposal_scenarios_ppc_test.rb:44
[ 62s] # ./test/support/proposal_examples.rb:30:in `block (2 levels) in '
[ 62s]
[ 62s] 96) Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PPC64 non-PowerNV if requires a PReP partition proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] Failure/Error: mount_point.start_with?(other + "/")
[ 62s]
[ 62s] NoMethodError:
[ 62s] undefined method `+' for nil:NilClass
[ 62s] Shared Example Group: "proposed layout" called from ./test/proposal_scenarios_ppc_test.rb:55
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/planned_volume.rb:251:in `block in shadows?'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/planned_volume.rb:250:in `any?'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/planned_volume.rb:250:in `shadows?'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/planned_volume.rb:203:in `block in create_subvolumes'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/planned_volume.rb:200:in `each'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/planned_volume.rb:200:in `create_subvolumes'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/partition_creator.rb:129:in `block in create_volumes_partitions'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/partition_creator.rb:117:in `each_with_index'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/partition_creator.rb:117:in `create_volumes_partitions'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/partition_creator.rb:89:in `process_free_space'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/partition_creator.rb:58:in `block in create_partitions'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/partition_creator.rb:57:in `each'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/partition_creator.rb:57:in `create_partitions'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/devicegraph_generator.rb:202:in `create_partitions'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal/devicegraph_generator.rb:79:in `devicegraph'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal.rb:106:in `devicegraph'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal.rb:153:in `block in proposed_root_device'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal.rb:148:in `each'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal.rb:148:in `proposed_root_device'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal.rb:130:in `populated_settings'
[ 62s] # ./src/lib/y2storage/proposal.rb:84:in `propose'
[ 62s] # ./test/support/proposal_examples.rb:29:in `block (2 levels) in '
[ 62s]
[ 62s] 97) Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PPC64 non-PowerNV if requires /boot and PReP partitions proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] Failure/Error: DEFAULT_FAILURE_NOTIFIER = lambda { |failure, _opts| raise failure }
[ 62s]
[ 62s] expected: "[[[\"disk\", [[\"align_ofs\", \"0 B\"], [\"block_size\", \"0.5 KiB\"], [\"io_size\", \"0 B\"], [\"mi..., [\"lvm_pvs\", [[[\"lvm_pv\", [[\"blk_device\", \"/dev/sda3\"]]]]]], [\"vg_name\", \"system\"]]]]]"
[ 62s] got: "[[[\"disk\", [[\"align_ofs\", \"0 B\"], [\"block_size\", \"0.5 KiB\"], [\"io_size\", \"0 B\"], [\"mi..., [\"lvm_pvs\", [[[\"lvm_pv\", [[\"blk_device\", \"/dev/sda3\"]]]]]], [\"vg_name\", \"system\"]]]]]"
[ 62s]
[ 62s] (compared using ==)
[ 62s] Shared Example Group: "proposed layout" called from ./test/proposal_scenarios_ppc_test.rb:61
[ 62s] # ./test/support/proposal_examples.rb:30:in `block (2 levels) in '
[ 62s]
[ 62s] Finished in 45.54 seconds (files took 1.01 seconds to load)
[ 62s] 734 examples, 97 failures, 2 pending
[ 62s]
[ 62s] Failed examples:
[ 62s]
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_test.rb:46 # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose when forced to create a small partition does not fail to make a proposal
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_test.rb:50 # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose when forced to create a small partition creates all the needed partitions
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_test.rb:137 # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose when installing on several GPT and MBR disks if no disk is enforced for '/' proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_test.rb:143 # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose when installing on several GPT and MBR disks if no disk is enforced for '/' allocates the root device in the biggest suitable disk
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_test.rb:150 # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose when installing on several GPT and MBR disks if a disk without free space is chosen for '/' proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_test.rb:170 # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose when installing on several GPT and MBR disks if a disk with enough free space is chosen for '/' proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_test.rb:176 # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose when installing on several GPT and MBR disks if a disk with enough free space is chosen for '/' allocates all the partitions there
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_test.rb:186 # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose when installing on several GPT and MBR disks if '/' is placed in a GPT disk (legacy boot) creates a bios_boot partition if it's not there
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:1:1:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PC with no partition table using LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:1:1:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PC with no partition table using LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:1:2:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PC with no partition table using Encrypted LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:1:2:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PC with no partition table using Encrypted LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:1:3:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PC with no partition table not using LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:1:3:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PC with no partition table not using LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:1:4:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PC with no partition table not using LVM but using encryption with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:1:4:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PC with no partition table not using LVM but using encryption without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:2:1:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows-only PC with MBR partition table using LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:2:1:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows-only PC with MBR partition table using LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:2:2:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows-only PC with MBR partition table using Encrypted LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:2:2:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows-only PC with MBR partition table using Encrypted LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:2:3:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows-only PC with MBR partition table not using LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:2:3:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows-only PC with MBR partition table not using LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:2:4:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows-only PC with MBR partition table not using LVM but using encryption with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:2:4:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows-only PC with MBR partition table not using LVM but using encryption without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:3:1:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows-only PC with 256 KiB of MBR gap using LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:3:1:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows-only PC with 256 KiB of MBR gap using LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:3:2:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows-only PC with 256 KiB of MBR gap not using LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:3:2:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows-only PC with 256 KiB of MBR gap not using LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:4:2:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows-only PC with 128 KiB of MBR gap not using LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:4:2:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows-only PC with 128 KiB of MBR gap not using LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:5:1:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows/linux multiboot PC with MBR partition table using LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:5:1:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows/linux multiboot PC with MBR partition table using LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:5:2:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows/linux multiboot PC with MBR partition table using Encrypted LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:5:2:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows/linux multiboot PC with MBR partition table using Encrypted LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:5:3:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows/linux multiboot PC with MBR partition table not using LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:5:3:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows/linux multiboot PC with MBR partition table not using LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:5:4:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows/linux multiboot PC with MBR partition table not using LVM but using encryption with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:5:4:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows/linux multiboot PC with MBR partition table not using LVM but using encryption without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:6:1:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a linux multiboot PC with MBR partition table using LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:6:1:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a linux multiboot PC with MBR partition table using LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:6:2:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a linux multiboot PC with MBR partition table using Encrypted LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:6:2:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a linux multiboot PC with MBR partition table using Encrypted LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:6:3:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a linux multiboot PC with MBR partition table not using LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:6:3:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a linux multiboot PC with MBR partition table not using LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:6:4:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a linux multiboot PC with MBR partition table not using LVM but using encryption with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:6:4:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a linux multiboot PC with MBR partition table not using LVM but using encryption without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:7:1:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows/linux multiboot PC with pre-existing LVM and MBR partition table using LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:7:1:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows/linux multiboot PC with pre-existing LVM and MBR partition table using LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:7:2:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows/linux multiboot PC with pre-existing LVM and MBR partition table not using LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:7:2:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows/linux multiboot PC with pre-existing LVM and MBR partition table not using LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:8:1:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows-only PC with GPT partition table using LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:8:1:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows-only PC with GPT partition table using LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:8:2:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows-only PC with GPT partition table using Encrypted LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:8:2:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows-only PC with GPT partition table using Encrypted LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:8:3:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows-only PC with GPT partition table not using LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:8:3:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows-only PC with GPT partition table not using LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:8:4:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows-only PC with GPT partition table not using LVM but using encryption with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:8:4:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows-only PC with GPT partition table not using LVM but using encryption without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:9:1:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows/linux multiboot PC with GPT partition table using LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:9:1:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows/linux multiboot PC with GPT partition table using LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:9:2:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows/linux multiboot PC with GPT partition table using Encrypted LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:9:2:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows/linux multiboot PC with GPT partition table using Encrypted LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:9:3:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows/linux multiboot PC with GPT partition table not using LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:9:3:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows/linux multiboot PC with GPT partition table not using LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:9:4:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows/linux multiboot PC with GPT partition table not using LVM but using encryption with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:9:4:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows/linux multiboot PC with GPT partition table not using LVM but using encryption without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:10:1:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a linux multiboot PC with GPT partition table using LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:10:1:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a linux multiboot PC with GPT partition table using LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:10:2:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a linux multiboot PC with GPT partition table using Encrypted LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:10:2:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a linux multiboot PC with GPT partition table using Encrypted LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:10:3:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a linux multiboot PC with GPT partition table not using LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:10:3:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a linux multiboot PC with GPT partition table not using LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:10:4:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a linux multiboot PC with GPT partition table not using LVM but using encryption with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:10:4:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a linux multiboot PC with GPT partition table not using LVM but using encryption without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:11:1:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows/linux multiboot PC with pre-existing LVM and GPT partition table using LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:11:1:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows/linux multiboot PC with pre-existing LVM and GPT partition table using LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:11:2:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows/linux multiboot PC with pre-existing LVM and GPT partition table not using LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:11:2:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a windows/linux multiboot PC with pre-existing LVM and GPT partition table not using LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:12:1:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PC with an empty partition table using LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:12:1:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PC with an empty partition table using LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:12:2:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PC with an empty partition table using Encrypted LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:12:2:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PC with an empty partition table using Encrypted LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:12:3:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PC with an empty partition table not using LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:12:3:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PC with an empty partition table not using LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:12:4:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PC with an empty partition table not using LVM but using encryption with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:12:4:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PC with an empty partition table not using LVM but using encryption without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:13:1:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PC with an empty GPT partition table using LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:13:1:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PC with an empty GPT partition table using LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:13:2:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PC with an empty GPT partition table using Encrypted LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:13:2:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PC with an empty GPT partition table using Encrypted LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:13:3:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PC with an empty GPT partition table not using LVM with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:13:3:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PC with an empty GPT partition table not using LVM without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:13:4:1:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PC with an empty GPT partition table not using LVM but using encryption with a separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_x86_test.rb[1:1:13:4:2:1] # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PC with an empty GPT partition table not using LVM but using encryption without separate home proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_ppc_test.rb:41 # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PPC64 bare metal (PowerNV) if requires a /boot partition proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_ppc_test.rb:52 # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PPC64 non-PowerNV if requires a PReP partition proposes the expected layout
[ 62s] rspec ./test/proposal_scenarios_ppc_test.rb:58 # Y2Storage::Proposal#propose in a PPC64 non-PowerNV if requires /boot and PReP partitions proposes the expected layout
[ 62s]
[ 62s] rake aborted!
[ 62s] Command failed with status (1): [rspec --color --format doc 'test/disk_size...]
[ 62s]
[ 62s] Tasks: TOP => test:unit
[ 62s] (See full trace by running task with --trace)
[ 62s] error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.VffYvk (%check)
[ 62s]
[ 62s]
[ 62s] RPM build errors:
[ 62s] Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.VffYvk (%check)
[ 62s]
[ 62s] yast-jenkins failed "build yast2-storage-ng.spec" at Mon Apr 3 17:07:06 UTC 2017.
[ 62s]
The buildroot was: /var/tmp/build-root-openSUSE_Factory
rm -rf YaST:storage-ng
rake aborted!
Command failed with status (1): [yes | osc -A 'https://api.opensuse.org/' b...]
Tasks: TOP => osc:commit => osc:build
(See full trace by running task with --trace)
cleaning
Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure