Dne úterý 23. dubna 2019 13:52:34 CEST, Per Jessen napsal(a):
Vojtěch Zeisek wrote:
Dne úterý 23. dubna 2019 12:48:08 CEST, Per Jessen napsal(a):
Seems to me we're back at BROKEN_HEADERS and asking the ISP to adjust the silly 10 point score for that rule? Vojtěch, any luck with that?
I pointed him to this discussion and all the resources, but he is still not convinced that problem is in rspamd or in his configuration. We don't observe any other 100% pattern, so can we rule out option, that problem is in some senders? Our conference? Prove it's rspamd's bug? Prove it's wrong server configuration?
If no one can step up and say "BROKEN_HEADERS are caused by <explanation>", I don't see how we can help much more. We don't actually know what the problem is, all we see are those high scores from rspamd. We're groping in the dark. Maybe your ISP can explain to us what BROKEN_HEADERS mean.
Finally we agreed with the server admin on lowering score obtained by BROKEN_HEADERS. Since then, there are no false positives and real spam is still correctly detected. So it seems rspamd is "just" too strict by default. -- Vojtěch Zeisek Komunita openSUSE GNU/Linuxu Community of the openSUSE GNU/Linux https://www.opensuse.org/ https://trapa.cz/