-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, 2017-12-17 at 18:58 -0800, L A Walsh wrote:
Carlos E. R. wrote:
I use NTFS for that purpose, I don't know any better.
/If/ you have a second machine, as server, you could set both samba and nfs on the same share; then import it in Windows via samba, and on Linux via NFS. Both would /see/ their own set of permissions and features, although the samba ones are emulations, not really written to disk (at least not if the underlying filesystem is Linux type).
I was under the impression that the Windows permissions were stored in extended attributes so that any Samba clients would be able to get consistent information regarding access.
I don't know about that :-?
It seems it would be safest and of most consistency to access a "share" with the same protocol. In *past* benchmarks, I've found SMB/CIFS to yield better performance than NFS -- especially for Windows clients, but that was some time ago.
Most of the delay in SMB/CIFS I see these days comes from the protocol being cpu bound on either the server or client depending on the application transmission unit and whether it is a reader or writer.
Not good if it is CPU bound. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. (from openSUSE 42.2 x86_64 "Malachite" at Telcontar) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlo4QuoACgkQtTMYHG2NR9VjcQCbBrLNQH0s5zobCyhoy28gGYxR dmMAn353+B5hFdIy10Tk2JGE7EYL+tHb =kTWG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org