On 2016-07-24 14:17, Anton Aylward wrote:
On 07/23/2016 08:52 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 2016-07-23 13:26, Anton Aylward wrote:
On 07/22/2016 04:55 PM, Anton Aylward wrote:
I categorize how many "*" there are 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 ... the degree of spam-ness. Some of the some false positives in the [10,20] and some of the [45,50] deserve black listing. Either way, it has, in the past, let me better tune the ratings.
Does anyone else do ratings / categorization by means of the 'score'?
Score? No, how do you do that?
Right now I do it by having multiple stanzas that count the number of asterisks:
* ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\** { LOG="SPAMSCOREYES 20SPAM " :0: $JUNKBOX/20SPAM } for 10, 20, 30, 40, 50+
Ah, I see. Yes, I remember reading about this years ago, when I started setting it up. No, I don't bother, I trigger on yes/no, which is at the '5' score? Then I review the spam folder(s) to see if some "subject" line looks like not spam to verify. Nowdays i get very little spam, anyway. Gmail does a very good job. My ISP does a nosy job, because it refuses and deletes spam without asking. I thought you had a method to, in user prefs, define a score for an address, instead of an absolute "all email from this address is spam", giving a 999 score. That's why I have created some (perl?) rules of my own. With difficulty, I don't speak perl. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from openSUSE Leap 42.1 x86_64 (test)) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org