Il 15. 10. 15 20:10, Xen ha scritto:
"Carlos E. R." <robin.listas@telefonica.net> schreef:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 2015-10-14 21:06, Xen wrote:
On Wed, 14 Oct 2015, Carlos E. R. wrote:
Then, apparently, the remote umask, at least for samba shares, is set to
Samba? Yesterday you said NFS. They are very different, regarding permissions and users.
Not really sure what you're responding to, sorry. I know I made a comparison between NFS and Samba. Samba won't transmit permissions (I think) and will just mount under the user you supplied for the samba share, ie. all the files will probably have that (remote) user.
Or maybe even the local user, I don't know. It's not like you can see in Windows. I believe in Linux mounting a samba share means setting its explicit user.
It depends whether or not the server providing the CIFS share has Linux integration capabilities, i.e. the Windows 2008 Unix interoperability components. My preferred choice was to install the NFS services or (years ago) an equivalent third-party product, this in order to minimize the components loaded in the clients and the configuration requirements. In this phase I have only "pure" Linux environments :-) (excluding a few winware VMs :-( ) so this is now a problem I'm happy to have behind me.... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org