On 10/14/2015 04:25 PM, Xen wrote:
That means it TRIPLES the amount of bandwidth required. How is that for an inefficient protocol? I don't know.
Are you running TCP or UDP? Soft mount or hard mount? What are you buffer sizes? What are your cache timeouts? What are directory cache sizes? What are you cache share settings across users? Are you using the NFSACL sideband protocol? Are you doing file locking? What protocol are you using for that? If you Ethernet interface can do DMA you'd be better of configuring NFS to use rDMA. NFS is very flexible. The downside to that is that you have to pay attentions. I've mounted trans-Atlantic file systems with a 56K pike in the way and still got useful work done, editing config files and doing system administration. There are better protocols for bulk file transfer than NFS. -- A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org