As always what to expect from systemd haters just some bullshit.
He claims that his logind, udevd, dbusd all are dead and combined into systemd. Source?
2014-06-04 7:18 GMT+02:00 Dirk Gently
jdebert wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 20:09:35 -0700 Linda Walsh
wrote: Damian Ivanov wrote:
I don't know what Anton said, I did.
If we won't be able to remove systemd without major troubles - great, finally a good API around for long time. No matter how much you whine about systemd it's there. And it will be. Good :-)
Since when are large monolithic programs either good or maintainable?
It's NOT modular design -- that is generally considered *BAD**...
Monoliths are monopolies.
It can't be broken apart (says its creator) -- again, these are all things that speak of bad design.
Windoze terminology is used in the documentation, i.e., runlevel 1 is no longer "single user" but is now "rescue mode". And systemd.conf looks an awful lot like a windoze config file.
That's both interesting and quite revealing.
Wouldn't be something if this turned out to be done under external pressure and eventually became Not Secure Anymore?
jd
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org