El 14/02/13 18:42, Brian K. White escribió:
On 2/14/2013 4:18 PM, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
El 14/02/13 18:01, Brian K. White escribió:
Neither of you two are fully right or fully wrong, but she is more right than you.
No, she is not or at least has failed to do her homework before posting imflamatory accusations of lock-in, closedness etc..
- fails to understand what are the basic supported scenarios.
- fails to understand how modern linux distributions work, or that very few of them now aim to be remotely similar to an old unix system.
You fail to understand that if you want to make a new and non backwards compatible computing environment, you should make up a new name for it instead of falsely advertizing that it is something that it is not. Android and webOS don't say "linux" anywhere in their marketing materials. They say android and webos.
It is backward compatible under the constrains I have already explained, which are the same since years and years this is nothing new.
You want, I have no idea what you want, but you've failed to explain how it justifies trampling all over users lives.
Nobody is trampling over users lives, or forcing anyone to do anything, it is free software, those who dont like the current state of things or the direction it is going are invited to: - Make rational arguments and workable suggestions in the proper channels or venues (i.e bugzilla) - Actually DO SOMETHING instead of complaining. - Choose another linux distribution, for the needs mentioned in this thread , it has a to a source based one or a BSD. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org