On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Lars Müller <lmuelle@suse.de> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 01:42:53PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
- Jones de Andrade <johannesrs@gmail.com> [03-01-10 12:59]:
I was having this problems, then I decided to put OO repo to priority 97 while the standard is 99 for everyone elese. Did I understood it backwards? ;) Because it still didn't work.
Yes, bigger numbers equal higher priority; 100 would have been a better choice.
Are you sure?
man zypper states:
-p, --priority <positive-integer> Set priority of the repository. Priority of 1 is the highest, the higher the number the lower the priority. Default priority is 99. Packages from repositories with higher priority will be preferred even in case there is a higher installable version available in the repository with a lower priority.
The issue seen by the initial poster might be caused by zypper not changing vendors while "up" compared to "dup" which causes vendors to change.
While using dup it might be usefull to limit the scope to a particular repository.
Lars
Lars Müller [ˈlaː(r)z ˈmʏlɐ] Samba Team SUSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Lars found precisely the help message I used to make my choice. Is there a mistake on that? Maybe zypper dup would have done the job. I forgot about testing that. But, shouldn't yast make a "dup" if available? ;) Sorry for the top posting. My bad. I usually interleave, then when I make a straigh reply I forget that. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org