* Carlos E. R.
On Thursday, 2008-11-20 at 20:41 -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
I also get a lot of these:
usbfs: process 7307 (newhidups) did not claim interface 0 before use
Yes, I see some of those during my tests:
Nov 20 15:04:24 nimrodel kernel: usb 1-1: usbfs: process 6538 (megatec_usb) did not claim interface 0 before use Nov 20 15:04:24 nimrodel kernel: usb 1-1: usbfs: process 6538 (megatec_usb) did not claim interface 0 before use Nov 20 15:08:28 nimrodel kernel: usb 1-1: usbfs: process 6503 (megatec_usb) did not claim interface 0 before use Nov 20 15:08:28 nimrodel kernel: usb 1-1: usbfs: process 6503 (megatec_usb) did not claim interface 0 before use
I /think/ it must be some kind of programming error of the driver.
If that is so, it's in more that one driver. I did some googling and found claims on the nut-upsuser forum/debian that: Anyway, this is only of historical interest, because whatever caused those messages, does not seem to be present in the newest version of everything (usbdev, libusb, nut). it was signed by --Peter ?? saw this sig on several posts Apparently it is *still* present, but not always faulty :^) also there were claims that "britty" was the cause and it was cured by removing britty, some kind of social networking app? -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org