James Knott wrote:
Rajko M. wrote:
On Sunday 17 February 2008 11:29:45 am James Knott wrote:
Philipp Thomas wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 23:28:13 -0500, James Knott wrote:
It's another area where Windows is behind the times.
Not really. NTFS is rather fragmentation resistent. It's only FAT and its decendants that lacks considerably.
Philipp
Then why does the defragmenter in XP show how fragmented NTFS partions are?
Fragmentation resistant doesn't mean fragmentation free.
I never said it does. Fragmentation resistant file systems will fragment, as they approach capacity. But even an NTFS partition that's only using a fraction of it's capacity may still require defragging. Fire up the defragger on any NTFS partition that hasn't been defragged for a while and tell me what you see.
And often with only 10% - 30% of the partition filled! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org