Randall R Schulz wrote:
On Sunday 24 December 2006 19:46, J Sloan wrote:
Randall R Schulz wrote:
Can you define what you mean when you say:
- "enough of a critical mass" - "to matter" - "leverage control" - "onramps to the information highway" - "game over" - "meaningful access" - "most internet content" - "islands" - "hopeless, irrelevant rebellion" - "microsoft world" Sorry, but if you're going to play dumb, it would be far too tedious and time consuming to try and bring you up to speed. Suffice it to say there is apparently a huge gap between our positions. Go back to sleep...
Then I take it you cannot neither explicate nor defend your position, whatever it may be, using concrete, unambiguous and non-metaphorical language.
I accept your concession.
No need. Perhaps I was too hasty to dismiss your questions - Each of the points you reference above can be easily grasped with just a bit of thought, but I hesitate to put a lot of work into explaining all these points if you're really determined not to understand. The bottom line is that you apparently see no danger to linux, but I do - as for the details, they will have to await another post, when I have some time to laboriously explain each of the common terms used above. Joe -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org