18 Oct
2006
18 Oct
'06
14:22
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Wednesday 2006-10-18 at 16:13 +0200, Marco Fioretti wrote:
that "it is strongly recommended that users not run badblocks directly, but rather use the -c option of the e2fsck and mke2fs programs".
shouldn't I do that instead?
It wouldn't hurt - well, mke2fs would.
Or, better, "e3fsck -c", since these are ext3 file systems?
There is no e3fsck; and if it were, it would be a symlink to the other. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFFNjiItTMYHG2NR9URAlThAJsGDLbcu4cdb7mIEGEfYtYU1hny6wCfcPOm +dY2xfzYwq/BjygNI6GW3C0= =bh7q -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----