On Tuesday 05 September 2006 18:26, suse@rio.vg wrote:
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
We're working on improving this. 10.1 does more than 9.3 did, so it takes longer - but it shouldn't be that bad. I expect 10.2 to see further speed-ups.
"further speed-ups" meaning it will take 10 minutes instead of 15? That would be a major speed up, but still broken.
Can you participate in a discussion without using inflammatory language? You're saying the same things over and over, which only serves to annoy people. People know it's not good the way it is, people know it's too slow, people know you're pissed off about it. Alright?
Do you believe there is room in rug/zmd's current design that will allow for an order of magnitude increase in speed?
There is a difference between design and implementation. You don't seem to want to understand this. A design can be correct even if the implementation is broken
I'm not seeing it.
Then again, you haven't looked at the code, have you
Aside from delta rpm support (which would greatly reduce the download time), you're still doing complete repodata updates on every wake up and every package install.
This would be a typical example of something which is implementation, and not design More things need to be cached, and not recalculated at each step. This is an example of an implementation improvement