2 May
2006
2 May
'06
09:02
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 10:41 +0200, Sven Burmeister wrote:
And SuSE 10.1 did not want to supply any kernel-tainting stuff anymore. What else then tainting is putting non-OSS stuff into (L)GPL code? If one does not want to have non-OSS bits in an OSS environment, then LGPL is not really what one wants to supply, as it encourages to use non-OSS bits.
SuSE providing non-OSS bits as compared to customers/users adding non-OSS code to their installed systems later are two different issues. Peter