4 Aug
2005
4 Aug
'05
16:07
On 8/4/05, Patrick Shanahan
There was discussion here earlier this year. As I recall, perhaps incorrectly, the use of "eth0" and "eth1" ... was not allowed. You may do a google list search and determine the correct naming, as it was explained in detail.
I''ll try to find it. I'm curious what's wrong with eth0:1 eth1:1 scheme though. -- Warm regards, Michael Green