On 5/2/05, Martin Deppe
Kevanf1 wrote:
On 4/30/05, Martin Deppe
wrote: Thanks Kevanf1,
I forgot to mention that SuSE 7.3 AND 9.0 are installed on that machine and are running well on it (or should I say walking? I never intended it to be a GUI workstation!).
I don't think 9.2 contains something that basically forbids it to run on that box.
Martin
The only thing I have found is that it (9.2) takes appreciably longer to load at boot than 9.1 But, I do have a full system together with a load of stuff that I could really safely trim back But it really shoudl load on a 166 chip with that much RAM....I would have thought.
Yes, when I tried it first, I think I gave enough time to get up, but I'll give it another try (tonight) will report then.
But shouldn't it response to
or even <Enter>? And it doesn't! So, I tried it now and waited for 45 minutes. I guess after that time it should have responded in some way or the other, but it didn't.
Any further suggestions?
Martin
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
If I were set up with the 166 Pentium here I would try loading it myself. Unfortunately I'm in no position to try it for a few months. I'll ask on my local LUG though and pass on any info' I get. -- Take care. Kevan Farmer 34 Hill Street Cheslyn Hay Staffordshire WS6 7HR