Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3666 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [SLE] New File System On a Flash Disk?
  • From: Randall R Schulz <rschulz@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 06:52:50 -0800
  • Message-id: <200503170652.50079.rschulz@xxxxxxxxx>

On Wednesday 16 March 2005 20:49, B. Stia wrote:
> ...
> >
> >
> > Thanks in advance for any information and suggestions anyone can
> > offer.
> As a aside to this question, (excuse my ignorance) Can this be made
> bootable and a small OS be put on it? For a permanent kind of thing
> in a mobile installation. (GPS in an aircraft) Right now I am using
> a 1.6 gig regular hard drive. If not, how about a DOC that can be
> booted and then passed to the flash drive?

Well, we'd prefer it if you only asked questions to which already knew
the answer, but...

(In that spirit, I will refrain from asking what a DOC is.)

You might want to investigate the practice mentioned earlier in this
thread by Danny Sauer's of using cramfs if you're looking for a
read-only, compressed file system for use in an embedded device.

And keep the other advice in mind, too, that a flash "disk" is still
flash RAM and it sustains only a limited number of writes. So Danny's
other recommendation to avoid a journalled file system is probably well
considered. I'm not personally familiar with the read/write patterns of
the various file systems, so I just take him at his word. Besides, the
fact that for users running the stock automount system for removable
media means that devices are all written synchronously (the kernel does
not engage in write-behind, saving disk blocks in buffer instead of
writing them as soon as the higher-level software issues the write
request), so there's little to be gained from using a journalled file

And now to a related question--Since my USB flash RAM devices have no
entries in /etc/fstab, how can I specify mount options? I'd like to
specify "noatime" to further reduce the number of write operations
performed on that device.

> Bob S.

Randall Schulz

< Previous Next >