"Sid Boyce" has best responses in the list. Thank you for your notice, Bahram Alinezhad, Rudehen, Tehran, Iran. ->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Sid Boyce" (sboyce@blueyonder.co.uk) wrote: ---------- I'm sticking with SuSE, but 9.2 has had its share of problems, it appears to have different personalities of a schizophrenic nature, so the problems people are encountering are real and need to be addressed. My employer of 25 years started out as the company with ideas, we made the best, most Powerful and robust mainframe hardware and in the process we made LOTS OF MONEY. Then the business types infiltrated the decision making process, it was a waste of resources trying to be the BEST, so the strategy was set - JUST MAKE MORE MONEY! - simply by applying the best Marketing Skills. The strange result, we never again made the BEST computers and we MADE LESS MONEY, till eventually we faded from existence, remaining only as an insignificant rump in a PC Sales outfit. The point here is, marketeers will advise SuSE that you can put this sort of stuff out and if you can stage a few good reviews, the job is well done. They are right, sales boom, more headlines showing good figures, but not for long. The Marketeers will move on to ruin some other unsuspecting outfit, the honest toilers will probably look for something more rewarding to do. I've seen Computer Architects laid off and reskilling as Chefs. It can happen - probably will, a few years down the road, remember I said so. Companies get properly established with a certain genetic code that may, if flawed, inexhorably lead to extinction, the Officers at the top believe that from their high perspective, they have an all-round view mere technical staff can't possibly have, unfortunately their ears are also a long way away from the comments and rumblings of dissatisfaction. Regards Sid. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<- __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! http://my.yahoo.com