8 Oct
2004
8 Oct
'04
19:13
On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 17:12, Jim Sabatke wrote:
Fergus Wilde wrote:
I understand that a new kernel is difficult and risky to introduce. On the other hand, I've heard enough credible (to me anyway) stories that 9.1 was pushed to release before it was really stable.
I hope if that problem exists, that it is fixed before a fine product's name is tarnished.
Jim
Check the latest copy of Linux Magazine, there is a good article on the kernel status and where it is going. -- Ken Schneider UNIX since 1989 SuSE since 1998 * Only reply to the list please*