On Tuesday 29 June 2004 12:12 am, Fred Miller wrote:
On Monday June 28 2004 5:47 pm, BandiPat wrote:
Congrats......it's rare. I can't tell you how many installs I've....they're ALL slow to varying degrees. My guess is the cause is the 2.6 kernel and AT LEAST some modules if not all.
Fred
===========
Or it could be all that "superior" hardware you get, while the rest of use this old SiS stuff that won't work. Oh wait a minute, mine does work! And well it does. :o)
So seem to persist in being ignorant. The vast majority of these systems aren't built by me (only 1 or 2), but are from Dell, HP, IBM, and others, and range from brand new to about 4 yrs. old. ============== Fred, You have a bad tendency to call others names when they really only apply to you and your thinking. The only thing ignorant is you, unwilling to consider other points of view. So that's the better hardware you use, well ok, I understand now.
I'm sure the 2.6 kernel introduce many new things to us and could affect different hardware differently, but everything I've installed on thus far is very sweet running.
You system is NOT the only system running 9.1, and you're experience is limited.
Fred =========
Right, my experience is limited as I've only used computers for a few days now. Oh and that is "your", not "you're" or "you"! Guess your english is lacking as well as your open mindedness. Is that a word? :o) Lee -- --- KMail v1.6.2 --- SuSE Linux Pro v9.1 --- Registered Linux User #225206 On any other day, that might seem strange...