On Saturday 10 April 2004 05:38, Hans du Plooy wrote:
On Saturday 10 April 2004 15:30, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Hans du Plooy
[04-10-04 07:46]: I'm running stock standard spamassassin with SUSE 9.0 Pro. It does not seem to be using bayes at all, even though I have specified in both my systemwide config and my user config. Summary in the tagged spam says:
a quickie, look in the ~/.spamassassin directory and check the dates on bayes_journal, bayes_seen and bayes_toks.
I wiped them two days ago, and sa-learned from my collected spam and ham, so they should be accurate. Or not?
I enabled rbl checks and razor, I hope that makes a difference.
RBL checks are fine. Razor checks are useless, because spam assassin catches more spam than razor does (by a LOT). Submitting known spam to razor helps users who only use razor, but does nothing for you (because your system already called it spam. BTW... I've found that installing spam assassin via CPAN is always preferable to using the included RPMs because you can get updates more frequently. -- _____________________________________ John Andersen